The paper explores the role of weight sharing and locality in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) compared to locally connected neural networks (LCNs) and fully connected neural networks (FCNs) on image-based tasks. It introduces the Dynamic Signal Distribution (DSD) task to model image patches, proving that CNNs require fewer samples due to weight sharing benefits. The study establishes sample complexity separations between these architectures, highlighting the statistical advantages of weight sharing and locality.
Introduction
Notation
Equivariant Algorithms
Minimax Framework
FCNs vs LCNs Separation Results
LCNs vs CNNs Separation Results
Conclusion and Future Work
To Another Language
from source content
arxiv.org
Key Insights Distilled From
by Aakash Lahot... at arxiv.org 03-26-2024
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.15707.pdfDeeper Inquiries