Core Concepts
Secure aggregation in federated learning lacks strong privacy against membership inference attacks, necessitating additional privacy mechanisms.
Abstract
The content delves into the privacy implications of secure aggregation (SecAgg) in federated learning, highlighting its vulnerability to membership inference attacks. Despite claims of privacy preservation, SecAgg offers weak privacy, especially in high-dimensional models. The analysis reveals the need for supplementary privacy-enhancing mechanisms, such as noise injection, in federated learning. The study includes experiments on the ADULT and EMNIST Digits datasets, showcasing the ineffectiveness of SecAgg in providing robust privacy.
Introduction to Federated Learning
Federated learning allows collaborative model training.
Secure aggregation (SecAgg) masks local updates for privacy.
Prevailing assumptions suggest strong privacy with SecAgg.
Privacy Analysis of SecAgg
Formal analysis reveals weak privacy against attacks.
Membership inference attacks exploit SecAgg vulnerabilities.
Additional mechanisms like noise injection are essential.
Experimental Results
ADULT dataset experiments show high success in attacks.
EMNIST Digits dataset confirms weak privacy with SecAgg.
Privacy auditing highlights the inefficacy of SecAgg.
Conclusion and Recommendations
SecAgg requires additional privacy measures.
High-dimensional models pose privacy challenges.
The study emphasizes the importance of robust privacy mechanisms in federated learning.
Stats
Our numerical results unveil that, contrary to prevailing claims, SecAgg offers weak privacy against membership inference attacks even in a single training round.
Quotes
"Our findings underscore the imperative for additional privacy-enhancing mechanisms in federated learning."