Re-identification of Patients from Histopathology Images Using Deep Learning Algorithms
Core Concepts
Deep learning algorithms can re-identify patients in histopathology datasets with substantial accuracy, raising privacy concerns.
Abstract
This study explores the potential of deep learning algorithms to re-identify patients from histopathology images. It discusses the importance of data anonymization to prevent patient identity leaks and presents a risk assessment scheme for estimating patient privacy risks before publication. The study includes experiments on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), and meningioma tissue datasets, highlighting the challenges and implications of patient re-identification in medical imaging.
Directory:
Introduction
Digitization of histopathology images revolutionizes tumor assessment.
Related Work
Studies on biometric identification using medical images.
Materials and Methods
Utilization of distinct datasets for experiments.
Experiments
Evaluation of re-identification possibilities between different time points.
Results
Performance comparison between patch-based and MIL approaches.
Discussion
Factors influencing re-identification success and implications for patient privacy.
Recommendations
Risk assessment scheme for safe publication of histopathology images.
Conclusion
Feasibility of patient re-identification from histopathology images with limitations.
Re-identification from histopathology images
Stats
"We predicted the source patient of a slide with F1 scores of 50.16% and 52.30% on the LSCC and LUAD datasets, respectively, and with 62.31% on our meningioma dataset."
Quotes
"No direct risk if properly anonymized."
"Re-identification more successful within same tumor sections."
"Models encode features into semantically meaningful latent space."
How can stain augmentation mitigate privacy risks?
Stain augmentation can help mitigate privacy risks by reducing the reliance of deep learning models on center-specific traces related to slide preparation. By applying stain augmentation techniques based on methods like stain normalization, variations in staining properties across different labs or centers can be minimized. This helps in preventing the model from using these subtle visual cues for re-identification, thus enhancing patient privacy.
What are the implications for sharing histopathology images across multiple publications?
Sharing histopathology images across multiple publications poses a risk of re-identification, especially if the same patient's data is included in different datasets with varying metadata. The tumor tissue itself could serve as a key to link datasets and potentially lead to patient re-identification. Therefore, it is crucial to keep track of which patients have been used in previous publications and ensure that metadata does not inadvertently reveal additional information that could aid in linking datasets.
How do covariant factors impact model performance in patient re-identification?
Covariant factors such as differences in staining procedures, tissue preparation techniques, or imaging equipment can significantly impact model performance in patient re-identification tasks. These factors may introduce biases or confounding variables that the model could unintentionally use for identifying patients rather than focusing solely on morphological features indicative of tumors. Understanding and mitigating these covariant factors are essential to ensure accurate and reliable results when using deep learning algorithms for patient re-identification from histopathology images.
0
Visualize This Page
Generate with Undetectable AI
Translate to Another Language
Scholar Search
Table of Content
Re-identification of Patients from Histopathology Images Using Deep Learning Algorithms
Re-identification from histopathology images
How can stain augmentation mitigate privacy risks?
What are the implications for sharing histopathology images across multiple publications?
How do covariant factors impact model performance in patient re-identification?