toplogo
Sign In

Comparative Evaluation of Domain-Specific Keyword Extraction Using Large Language Models


Core Concepts
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in extracting relevant keywords from text, outperforming traditional statistical and linguistic approaches. This study provides a comparative analysis of the performance of three prominent LLMs - Llama2-7B, GPT-3.5, and Falcon-7B - in domain-specific keyword extraction tasks using the Inspec and PubMed datasets.
Abstract
This study focuses on evaluating the performance of three large language models - Llama2-7B, GPT-3.5, and Falcon-7B - in the task of domain-driven keyword extraction. The researchers utilized the Inspec and PubMed datasets, which represent scientific literature from various disciplines, to assess the models' capabilities. The study employed the Jaccard similarity index to quantitatively compare the keywords extracted by the models against the reference keywords from the datasets. The results showed that GPT-3.5 achieved the highest average Jaccard similarity scores of 0.64 for the Inspec dataset and 0.21 for the PubMed dataset, indicating a substantial overlap between its generated keywords and the reference sets. Llama2-7B demonstrated a more mixed performance, with a Jaccard similarity score of 0.40 for Inspec and 0.17 for PubMed. The researchers noted that Llama2-7B exhibited a tendency to generate additional keywords that were not present in the reference sets, suggesting its ability to identify potentially relevant terms that may have been overlooked. However, this also contributed to a lower overall Jaccard similarity score, particularly for the PubMed dataset. Falcon-7B showed the lowest Jaccard similarity scores, with 0.23 for Inspec and 0.12 for PubMed, indicating a limited overlap between its generated keywords and the reference sets. The researchers observed that Falcon-7B's output included unnecessary words, which negatively impacted the overall quality of the extracted keywords. The study also discussed the impact of hallucination, a phenomenon where LLMs generate factually inaccurate information, on the evaluation and interpretation of the results. The researchers highlighted the need to understand and address these hallucination-related challenges to optimize the performance of LLMs in domain-specific keyword extraction tasks. Furthermore, the study emphasized the importance of prompt engineering techniques in guiding the LLMs towards more effective and accurate keyword extraction. The researchers developed a custom Python package that seamlessly integrates with the LangChain framework, enabling efficient interaction with the various LLMs and facilitating the application of prompt engineering strategies. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the comparative performance of Llama2-7B, GPT-3.5, and Falcon-7B in domain-specific keyword extraction tasks, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each model. The findings contribute to the ongoing research and development in the field of natural language processing, particularly in the context of leveraging large language models for data enrichment and content analysis.
Stats
GPT-3.5 achieved an average Jaccard similarity score of 0.64 for the Inspec dataset and 0.21 for the PubMed dataset. Llama2-7B achieved an average Jaccard similarity score of 0.40 for the Inspec dataset and 0.17 for the PubMed dataset. Falcon-7B achieved an average Jaccard similarity score of 0.23 for the Inspec dataset and 0.12 for the PubMed dataset.
Quotes
"Large language models have brought about a tremendous revolution in the field of keyword extraction." "GPT-3.5 emerges as a precision-focused model, generating concise keywords with contextual alignment." "Llama2-7B exhibits a propensity to introduce additional terms, contributing to a broader scope, while Falcon-7B, despite presenting challenges with unnecessary words, demonstrates some competency in extracting pertinent keywords."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the performance of these large language models be further improved for domain-specific keyword extraction tasks?

To enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) for domain-specific keyword extraction tasks, several strategies can be implemented: Fine-tuning with Domain-Specific Data: Training LLMs with domain-specific datasets can significantly improve their understanding of specialized terminology and context, leading to more accurate keyword extraction. Prompt Engineering Optimization: Developing tailored prompts that guide LLMs to focus specifically on domain-related keywords can enhance their performance in extracting relevant terms. Model Architecture Enhancements: Continual refinement of the model architecture to better capture domain-specific nuances and relationships can improve keyword extraction accuracy. Temperature Parameter Optimization: Adjusting the temperature parameter in LLMs can impact the balance between precision and diversity in keyword extraction, allowing for more targeted results. Evaluation Metrics Refinement: Developing more nuanced evaluation metrics that consider domain-specific relevance and context can provide a more accurate assessment of keyword extraction performance. By implementing these strategies, LLMs can be further optimized for domain-specific keyword extraction tasks, improving their effectiveness and relevance in various specialized fields.

How can the potential ethical considerations and biases that may arise from the use of large language models in keyword extraction be addressed?

Addressing potential ethical considerations and biases in the use of large language models (LLMs) for keyword extraction is crucial to ensure fair and unbiased results. Here are some approaches to mitigate these issues: Diverse Training Data: Ensuring that LLMs are trained on diverse and inclusive datasets can help reduce biases in keyword extraction by exposing the models to a wide range of perspectives and language usage. Bias Detection and Mitigation: Implementing bias detection algorithms within LLMs to identify and mitigate any biases present in the extracted keywords can help improve the fairness of the results. Transparency and Explainability: Providing transparency in the keyword extraction process and making the decision-making of LLMs more explainable can help users understand how keywords are generated and identify any potential biases. Human Oversight: Incorporating human oversight and validation in the keyword extraction process can help verify the accuracy and fairness of the results, reducing the impact of biases introduced by the models. By adopting these measures, ethical considerations and biases in keyword extraction using LLMs can be effectively addressed, promoting fairness and reliability in the outcomes.

How can the integration of human expertise and interactive tools enhance the effectiveness of large language models in keyword extraction across diverse domains?

Integrating human expertise and interactive tools can significantly enhance the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in keyword extraction across diverse domains by: Domain-Specific Knowledge Incorporation: Human experts can provide valuable domain-specific knowledge to guide LLMs in extracting relevant keywords that align with the specific context and terminology of diverse domains. Interactive Prompting: Interactive tools that allow users to provide feedback and refine keyword extraction results can improve the accuracy and relevance of the extracted keywords, ensuring they meet the requirements of different domains. Quality Assurance: Human oversight can help validate the extracted keywords, ensuring they are accurate, contextually relevant, and free from biases, thereby enhancing the overall quality of keyword extraction across diverse domains. Customized Prompt Design: Collaborating with domain experts to design customized prompts that cater to the unique requirements of different domains can improve the LLMs' performance in extracting domain-specific keywords effectively. By leveraging human expertise and interactive tools in conjunction with LLMs, keyword extraction can be tailored to diverse domains, resulting in more precise, relevant, and reliable outcomes.
0