toplogo
Sign In

Evaluating Language Model Embeddings: Variance and Invariance to Semantic and Lexical Alterations


Core Concepts
Language models face challenges in precisely understanding the semantics of language, exhibiting different behaviors for semantically equivalent sentences with varying syntactic/lexical structures. The VISLA benchmark systematically evaluates the ability of language models to distinguish semantic and lexical variations in text.
Abstract
The paper introduces the VISLA (Variance and Invariance to Semantic and Lexical Alterations) benchmark to evaluate the semantic and lexical understanding of language models. VISLA presents a 3-way semantic (in)equivalence task with a triplet of sentences associated with an image, to assess both vision-language models (VLMs) and unimodal language models (ULMs). The evaluation on 34 VLMs and 20 ULMs reveals surprising difficulties in distinguishing between lexical and semantic variations. Spatial semantics encoded by language models also appear to be highly sensitive to lexical information. Text encoders of VLMs demonstrate greater sensitivity to semantic and lexical variations than unimodal text encoders. The paper's contributions include the unification of image-to-text and text-to-text retrieval tasks, an off-the-shelf evaluation without fine-tuning, and assessing LMs' semantic (in)variance in the presence of lexical alterations. The results highlight strengths and weaknesses across diverse vision and unimodal language models, contributing to a deeper understanding of their capabilities.
Stats
The trolley is being pulled by a white horse in front of it. A white horse is pulling a trolley behind it. There is a white horse pulling a trolley next to it.
Quotes
"Despite their remarkable successes, state-of-the-art language models face challenges in grasping certain important semantic details." "Spatial semantics encoded by language models also appear to be highly sensitive to lexical information, and lexical overlap can divert models from capturing spatial semantics." "Text encoders of vision LMs are more sensitive to semantic and lexical variations than unimodal text encoders."

Deeper Inquiries

How can language models be improved to better capture the semantic relationships between text, beyond just the lexical and syntactic forms?

Language models can be enhanced to better capture semantic relationships by incorporating more diverse and comprehensive training data that cover a wide range of semantic nuances. Additionally, models can benefit from incorporating explicit semantic constraints or rules during training to guide the learning process towards a deeper understanding of semantic relationships. Techniques such as multi-task learning, where models are trained on multiple related tasks simultaneously, can also help improve semantic understanding by encouraging the model to learn different aspects of semantics. Furthermore, leveraging contextual information and world knowledge can aid in capturing subtle semantic nuances that go beyond just the surface-level lexical and syntactic forms of text. Fine-tuning models on specific semantic tasks or datasets can also help tailor the model's understanding of semantic relationships to specific domains or contexts.

What are the potential biases or limitations in the VISLA benchmark that could be addressed in future work?

One potential bias in the VISLA benchmark could be the selection of images and associated captions, which may not fully represent the diversity of semantic and lexical variations present in natural language. To address this, future work could focus on curating a more diverse and representative dataset of images and captions to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of language models' semantic understanding. Additionally, the benchmark may have limitations in terms of the complexity of semantic relationships evaluated, and future iterations could introduce more nuanced semantic tasks to challenge models further. Another limitation could be the reliance on cosine similarity for evaluation, which may not fully capture the intricacies of semantic relationships. Future work could explore more sophisticated evaluation metrics that consider semantic nuances in a more nuanced manner.

How might the insights from the VISLA evaluation be applied to improve the compositionality and robustness of language models in real-world applications?

The insights from the VISLA evaluation can be leveraged to enhance the compositionality and robustness of language models in real-world applications by guiding model development towards a deeper understanding of semantic relationships. By focusing on disentangling semantic and lexical variations, models can be trained to prioritize semantic consistency over surface-level lexical similarities, leading to more robust and interpretable representations. Additionally, the evaluation results can inform the development of specialized training strategies that emphasize semantic compositionality, such as incorporating explicit semantic constraints or utilizing multi-task learning with tasks that require compositional reasoning. By addressing the challenges identified in the VISLA evaluation, language models can be better equipped to handle complex semantic tasks in real-world applications, leading to improved performance and reliability.
0