toplogo
Sign In

Leveraging Syntax to Enhance In-context Example Selection for Improved Machine Translation


Core Concepts
Syntax-based in-context example selection can effectively improve the performance of large language models on machine translation tasks.
Abstract
The paper proposes a novel syntax-based in-context example selection strategy for machine translation (MT) tasks. It computes the syntactic similarity between dependency trees using Polynomial Distance to select the most informative examples for in-context learning. Additionally, the authors present an ensemble strategy that combines examples selected by both word-level and syntax-level criteria. The key highlights are: For the first time, the authors introduce a syntax-based in-context example selection method for MT, going beyond previous approaches that focused on superficial word-level features. The proposed ensemble strategy, which concatenates examples selected by BM25 and the syntax-based Polynomial Distance, takes advantage of both word-level closeness and deep syntactic similarity. Experimental results on translation between English and 6 common languages show that the syntax-based methods and the ensemble strategy outperform various baselines, obtaining the highest COMET scores on 11 out of 12 translation directions. The authors call on the NLP community to pay more attention to syntactic knowledge when embracing large language models, as syntax can effectively enhance in-context learning for syntax-rich tasks like MT.
Stats
"New aircraft cannot be purchased" due to international sanctions. The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center said there was no sign of a tsunami.
Quotes
"For the first time, we propose a novel syntax-based in-context example selection strategy for MT." "We present a simple but effective ensemble strategy to combine in-context examples selected from different criteria, taking advantage of both superficial word overlapping and deep syntactic similarity." "We prove that syntax is effective in finding informative in-context examples for MT. We call on the NLP community not to ignore the significance of syntax when embracing LLMs."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Chenming Tan... at arxiv.org 03-29-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.19285.pdf
Going Beyond Word Matching

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed syntax-based selection strategy be extended to other language-rich tasks beyond machine translation?

The syntax-based selection strategy proposed in the context can be extended to various language-rich tasks beyond machine translation by leveraging syntactic information to enhance model performance. For tasks like text summarization, sentiment analysis, and question-answering, incorporating syntactic similarity between examples and target tasks can improve the quality of in-context examples provided to the model. By analyzing the syntactic structures of sentences and selecting examples based on their similarity at a deeper level, the model can better understand the context and generate more accurate outputs. Furthermore, in tasks like natural language understanding and generation, syntactic information plays a crucial role in capturing the nuances of language. By extending the syntax-based selection strategy to these tasks, models can benefit from a more comprehensive understanding of the input context, leading to improved performance in tasks that require a nuanced understanding of language semantics and syntax.

What are the potential limitations of relying solely on syntactic similarity for in-context example selection, and how can these be addressed?

While relying on syntactic similarity for in-context example selection can be beneficial, there are potential limitations to consider. One limitation is that syntactic structures alone may not capture the full semantic meaning of a sentence. Syntax-based selection may overlook examples that have different surface structures but convey similar meanings, leading to a narrow selection of examples. To address these limitations, a hybrid approach that combines both syntactic and semantic information can be adopted. By incorporating semantic similarity measures along with syntactic features, the model can capture a more comprehensive understanding of the context. Additionally, integrating contextual information, such as word embeddings or contextual embeddings, can help bridge the gap between syntactic and semantic representations, enabling a more holistic selection of in-context examples. Another limitation is the computational complexity of syntactic analysis, especially for languages with complex syntactic structures. To mitigate this, efficient parsing algorithms and pre-trained syntactic parsers can be utilized to streamline the process and make it more scalable for a wide range of languages and tasks.

Given the importance of syntax highlighted in this work, how can syntactic information be better integrated into the design and training of large language models themselves?

Syntactic information can be better integrated into the design and training of large language models by incorporating syntactic features directly into the model architecture. One approach is to pre-train the model with syntactic tasks, such as dependency parsing or constituency parsing, to encourage the model to learn syntactic representations during training. By fine-tuning the model on syntactic tasks, it can develop a better understanding of syntax and improve its performance on tasks that require syntactic knowledge. Additionally, syntactic information can be used as an additional input modality alongside text input during training. By providing the model with explicit syntactic features or representations, it can learn to leverage syntactic cues to enhance its predictions. This can be achieved through multi-task learning, where the model is trained on both syntactic and downstream tasks simultaneously to jointly optimize for syntactic and semantic understanding. Moreover, syntactic information can be incorporated into the attention mechanisms of the model to allow it to attend to relevant syntactic structures during inference. By designing attention mechanisms that consider syntactic dependencies, the model can better capture long-range dependencies and improve its performance on tasks that rely on syntactic information. By integrating syntactic information into the design and training of large language models, we can enhance their ability to understand and generate language with a deeper understanding of syntax, leading to more accurate and contextually relevant outputs.
0