toplogo
Resources
Sign In

Unsupervised Aggregation of Universal Dependency Parse Trees Improves Performance over Individual Parsers


Core Concepts
Unsupervised aggregation of dependency parse trees using the Customized Ising Model (CIM) can outperform individual state-of-the-art dependency parsers, including ensemble and language model-based methods.
Abstract
This study compares three unsupervised aggregation frameworks - Maximum Spanning Tree (MST), Conflict Resolution on Heterogeneous Data (CRH), and Customized Ising Model (CIM) - for aggregating dependency parse trees. The key highlights are: The dependency parse tree aggregation problem is modeled as an edge-level binary label aggregation problem, allowing the use of CRH and CIM which are designed for label aggregation. Extensive experiments on 71 Universal Dependency (UD) test treebanks covering 49 languages show that CIM is the most suitable aggregation framework. It can properly estimate parser quality and outperform individual state-of-the-art parsers, including ensemble and language model-based methods. CIM outperforms the ensemble methods HIT-SCIR and LATTICE, the non-ensemble methods TurkuNLP and UDPipe Future, as well as the language model-based parsers UAdapter and MLPSBM. The results demonstrate that unsupervised aggregation can effectively combine the strengths of multiple parsers to achieve better performance than individual parsers, even the best ones.
Stats
The aggregated results using CIM outperform the best individual parser among the top 9 chosen parsers for each test treebank in terms of mean and median Unlabeled Attachment Score (UAS). For high-resource language treebanks, the mean UAS of CIM is 93.18 compared to 93.04 for the best individual parser MLPSBM. For low-resource language treebanks, the mean UAS of CIM is 85.93 compared to 84.08 for the best individual parser.
Quotes
"Aggregation methods, in general, achieve better performance than ensemble methods, with higher mean UAS scores and lower standard deviation across different test treebanks." "CIM can outperform all baseline methods in terms of mean and median in both high-resource and low-resource language treebanks, and standard deviation in low-resource language treebanks, even comparing with the best parser among the chosen top 9 for each test treebank."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed CIM aggregation framework be extended to also aggregate the relation labels of dependency parse trees?

The CIM aggregation framework can be extended to aggregate the relation labels of dependency parse trees by modifying the binary label aggregation problem to incorporate relation labels. Instead of considering only the existence of an edge as a binary label, we can assign different labels to represent different types of relations between tokens in the dependency parse trees. This would require expanding the label space and adjusting the aggregation process to handle multiple types of relation labels. To implement this extension, we can redefine the edge-level binary label aggregation problem to include relation labels as multi-class labels. Each edge in the dependency parse tree can be assigned a relation label based on the type of dependency or relationship it represents. The CIM model can then be adapted to estimate the joint distribution of the relation labels provided by different parsers and the unknown ground truth relation labels. The Ising model used in CIM can be modified to handle multi-class labels by extending the parameter estimation and inference steps to accommodate the new label space. The correlation between input parsers can be modeled based on the relation labels they assign to the edges in the dependency parse trees. By considering the correlation between relation labels, the CIM framework can effectively aggregate the relation labels from multiple parsers to generate a more accurate and reliable representation of the dependency parse trees.

How can the insights from this study on unsupervised aggregation of dependency parse trees be applied to improve performance in downstream NLP tasks such as relation extraction and aspect extraction?

The insights from the study on unsupervised aggregation of dependency parse trees can be applied to improve performance in downstream NLP tasks such as relation extraction and aspect extraction in the following ways: Enhanced Dependency Parsing: By improving the quality of dependency parse trees through unsupervised aggregation, the accuracy of relation extraction and aspect extraction tasks that rely on these parse trees can be significantly enhanced. More accurate and reliable parse trees provide a solid foundation for extracting meaningful relationships and aspects from text data. Error Correction: The aggregation framework can help in correcting errors introduced by individual parsers, leading to more consistent and reliable results in downstream tasks. By leveraging the aggregated parse trees, the performance of relation extraction and aspect extraction models can be improved by reducing noise and inconsistencies in the input data. Domain Adaptation: The language and domain-agnostic nature of the aggregation framework allows for its application across different languages and domains. This flexibility can be leveraged to adapt relation extraction and aspect extraction models to new languages or domains by providing high-quality parse trees as input. Ensemble Learning: The aggregation framework can be integrated into ensemble learning approaches for relation extraction and aspect extraction. By combining the outputs of multiple parsers using the aggregation framework, ensemble models can benefit from the diversity of input sources and improve overall performance. Overall, the insights gained from the study on unsupervised aggregation of dependency parse trees can serve as a foundational step towards enhancing the performance of downstream NLP tasks such as relation extraction and aspect extraction by ensuring the quality and consistency of input data.
0