The Futile Pursuit of Absolute Certainty in Philosophy

Core Concepts

The quest for an absolute, indubitable foundation for philosophical knowledge, as championed by Descartes, is fundamentally flawed and unattainable.

Abstract

The content discusses the problems with Descartes' philosophical approach of seeking a single, certain starting point for all knowledge, known as Cartesian foundationalism.
The author begins by noting that most major philosophers have not started from their immediate circumstances, but have instead sought an "ideal standpoint" or foundation, as Descartes did. Descartes believed that sound philosophy could only begin from an apodictically certain starting point, proven with mathematical precision.
However, the author argues that subsequent history has shown this quest for certainty to be misguided. Science, for example, does not and cannot seek absolute certainties, but rather progresses through provisional, fallible knowledge. The author suggests that the Cartesian approach of seeking a single, indubitable foundation for all knowledge is fundamentally flawed and unattainable.
The content implies that a more reasonable approach to philosophy would be to start from one's actual circumstances and experiences, rather than attempting to reason one's way to an idealized, certain starting point.

Stats

None.

Quotes

None.

Key Insights Distilled From

The Questionable Quest for Certainty

by Steven Yates at stevenyates.medium.com 03-26-2024

https://stevenyates.medium.com/the-questionable-quest-for-certainty-aafe4888f692

Deeper Inquiries

What are the potential consequences of abandoning the quest for absolute certainty in philosophy and embracing a more fallibilistic approach?

Abandoning the quest for absolute certainty in philosophy and adopting a fallibilistic approach can have several consequences. Firstly, it allows for a more humble and realistic understanding of knowledge. By acknowledging the fallibility of human reasoning and the limitations of our perspectives, philosophers can engage in more open-ended and exploratory inquiries. This approach encourages continuous questioning and revision of beliefs, leading to a more dynamic and adaptive philosophical discourse. Additionally, embracing fallibilism can promote intellectual humility and openness to diverse viewpoints, fostering a more inclusive and collaborative philosophical community. It also aligns with the complexities of the world, where certainty is often elusive and subject to change.

How might a Cartesian foundationalist respond to the critique presented in the content?

A Cartesian foundationalist might respond to the critique by emphasizing the importance of establishing a secure epistemological foundation for knowledge. They could argue that without a firm and indubitable starting point, philosophical inquiries risk descending into skepticism and relativism. The foundationalist might defend Descartes' method of seeking absolute certainty as a necessary safeguard against intellectual chaos and confusion. They could also point out that while fallibilism allows for flexibility and openness, it may lack the rigor and clarity provided by a foundationalist approach. In essence, the Cartesian foundationalist would likely uphold the value of certainty as a guiding principle in philosophical inquiry.

In what ways could the insights from this critique of Cartesian philosophy be applied to other domains, such as science, politics, or personal decision-making?

The insights from the critique of Cartesian philosophy can be applied to various domains beyond philosophy. In science, the quest for absolute certainty can hinder progress by promoting dogmatism and inhibiting the exploration of new ideas. Embracing a more fallibilistic approach in science can encourage innovation, collaboration, and a willingness to revise theories in light of new evidence. Similarly, in politics, the pursuit of absolute certainty can lead to ideological rigidity and polarization. Adopting a fallibilistic mindset in politics can promote dialogue, compromise, and a recognition of the complexity of social issues.
In personal decision-making, the critique of Cartesian philosophy highlights the dangers of rigid certainty and the benefits of embracing uncertainty. Recognizing the fallibility of our beliefs and decisions can lead to greater self-reflection, openness to feedback, and a willingness to learn from mistakes. By applying the insights from this critique to other domains, individuals and societies can cultivate a more nuanced, adaptive, and resilient approach to knowledge and decision-making.