toplogo
Sign In

Adaptive Online Demonstration Expansion for Efficient Multi-Task Visual Policy Learning


Core Concepts
AdaDemo, a framework that actively and continuously expands the demonstration dataset, can progressively improve the performance of multi-task visual policies in a data-efficient manner.
Abstract
The paper introduces AdaDemo, a framework for adaptive online demonstration expansion to improve multi-task visual policy learning. Key highlights: AdaDemo advocates an online, iterative approach to expand the demonstration dataset, in contrast to the conventional use of pre-collected and static datasets in imitation learning. AdaDemo employs three core principles to ensure data efficiency: 1) Prioritizing the collection of demonstrations for tasks with low policy performance, 2) Focusing on acquiring demonstrations for initial states where the policy underperforms, and 3) Adapting the sampling strategy during training to emphasize challenging tasks. Extensive experiments on two robotic manipulation benchmarks (RLBench and Adroit) with a total of 22 tasks demonstrate AdaDemo's capability to progressively improve policy performance by guiding the generation of high-quality demonstration datasets in a data-efficient manner. Compared to a uniform data collection baseline, AdaDemo exhibits significant data efficiency, achieving better performance with only 1/2 the data on RLBench and 1/3 on Adroit.
Stats
"Encouraged by the remarkable achievements of language and vision foundation models, developing generalist robotic agents through imitation learning, using large demonstration datasets, has become a prominent area of interest in robot learning." "The efficacy of imitation learning is heavily reliant on the quantity and quality of the demonstration datasets." "Compared to the baseline, AdaDemo exhibits significant data efficiency, particularly at points where performance plateaus. It achieves better performance with only 1/2 the data on RLBench and 1/3 on Adroit."
Quotes
"AdaDemo strategically collects new demonstrations to address the identified weakness in the existing policy, ensuring data efficiency is maximized." "Through a comprehensive evaluation on a total of 22 tasks across two robotic manipulation benchmarks (RLBench and Adroit), we demonstrate AdaDemo's capability to progressively improve policy performance by guiding the generation of high-quality demonstration datasets in a data-efficient manner."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Tongzhou Mu,... at arxiv.org 04-12-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.07428.pdf
AdaDemo

Deeper Inquiries

How can AdaDemo's principles be extended to other types of learning algorithms beyond imitation learning, such as reinforcement learning or hybrid approaches

AdaDemo's principles can be extended to other learning algorithms beyond imitation learning by adapting the core concepts to suit the specific requirements of those algorithms. For reinforcement learning, the idea of actively expanding the dataset could involve dynamically collecting new experiences during training to improve sample efficiency. This could be achieved by prioritizing the collection of experiences in states where the current policy performs poorly, similar to AdaDemo's approach with failed initial states. Additionally, for reinforcement learning, the sampling strategy could be adjusted to prioritize experiences that lead to high rewards or exploration of uncertain regions in the state space. This would ensure that the reinforcement learning agent learns more effectively from the collected data. In the case of hybrid approaches that combine elements of both imitation learning and reinforcement learning, AdaDemo's principles could be applied in a more nuanced manner. For example, the demonstration collection process could focus on generating diverse demonstrations that cover a wide range of scenarios, combining the strengths of both imitation and reinforcement learning. The sampling strategy could then be tailored to balance the learning from both types of data, ensuring a comprehensive and effective training process for the hybrid model.

What are the potential limitations of the current demonstration collector assumptions in AdaDemo, and how could they be relaxed or improved to handle more challenging scenarios

The current demonstration collector assumptions in AdaDemo may have limitations in handling more challenging scenarios, particularly in real-world applications. One potential limitation is the reliance on predefined initial states for task completion, which may not cover all possible scenarios that the robot may encounter in a dynamic environment. To address this limitation, the demonstration collector could be enhanced to adapt to novel or unforeseen situations by incorporating online learning techniques. This would allow the collector to continuously update its knowledge and generate demonstrations for a wider range of states, improving the robustness of the learned policy. Another limitation could be the scalability of the demonstration collector in collecting demonstrations for a large number of tasks or in complex environments. To overcome this limitation, the collector could leverage techniques such as hierarchical task decomposition or active learning to prioritize the collection of demonstrations for tasks that are more critical or challenging. By focusing on key tasks and states, the collector can optimize its data collection efforts and improve the overall performance of the learned policy.

Given the observed performance differences across tasks, how could AdaDemo's sampling strategy be further refined to better balance the learning across diverse tasks

To better balance the learning across diverse tasks, AdaDemo's sampling strategy could be further refined by incorporating task-specific weighting or importance sampling techniques. By assigning different weights to demonstrations from different tasks based on their difficulty or importance, the sampling strategy can focus more on challenging tasks that contribute significantly to the overall performance. This would ensure that the model receives more exposure to critical tasks and learns effectively from them. Additionally, the sampling strategy could be adapted to dynamically adjust the sampling probabilities based on the performance of the model during training. Tasks that the model struggles with could be sampled more frequently to provide additional learning opportunities, while tasks that the model performs well on could be sampled less frequently to prevent overfitting. This adaptive sampling approach would help maintain a balance between exploration and exploitation, leading to more efficient and effective learning across all tasks.
0