Core Concepts
Science offers a method to dispel mysticism and seek answers promptly, contrasting with Rilke's patient approach.
Abstract
In the article, Avi Loeb challenges Rainer Maria Rilke's advice on patience by advocating for immediate scientific inquiry. He emphasizes the importance of understanding physical reality through science rather than living in mystic fog. The author discusses the process of scientific publication, highlighting potential biases in peer review that hinder the dissemination of new knowledge. Furthermore, he explores the role of artificial intelligence in improving the review process and suggests that encountering extraterrestrial civilizations could enhance our scientific practices.
Stats
"Quantitative insights about nature are communicated by scientists through peer-reviewed papers."
"A dysfunctional review process slows-down the acceptance of new knowledge and its use by society."
"AI/ML systems could advise authors about references that they have missed."
"AI/ML systems that are trained on human-written texts could flag the weaknesses of scientists and reviewers alike during the peer-review process."
Quotes
"I respectfully disagree with Rilke’s patience. Science offers the privilege of clearing Rilke’s mystic fog over physical reality." - Avi Loeb
"Innovation implies taking the risk of being wrong and the culture of science must tolerate retractions based on new facts." - Magdalena Skipper
"I wish we were humbler and bolder." - Magdalena Skipper