Modeling Sustainable City Trips: Integrating CO2 Emissions, Popularity, and Seasonality into Tourism Recommender Systems

Core Concepts

Introducing a novel approach for sustainable city trip recommendations by integrating CO2 emissions, popularity, and seasonal demand.

Abstract

The article discusses the importance of sustainable city trip recommendations through the integration of CO2 emissions, popularity, and seasonal demand. It highlights the complexities of tourism, the need for fair Tourism Recommender Systems (TRS), and the impact of tourism on local communities and the environment. The methodology involves data gathering on transportation modes, emissions, destination popularity, and seasonal demand, validated through user studies. The paper contributes to responsible tourism strategies and equitable tourism practices. Directory: Introduction to Recommender Systems RS simplifies trip planning by providing personalized recommendations. Challenges in the tourism domain include seasonality and capacity constraints. Fairness in Tourism Recommender Systems Multistakeholder approach is crucial for fairness in TRS. Stakeholders include consumers, providers, platforms, and society. Sustainable Tourism Practices Sustainable tourism defined by its economic, social, and environmental impacts. Importance of sustainability in tourism for long-term competitiveness. Role of TRS in Sustainable Tourism TRS can address overtourism and undertourism challenges. Recommending sustainable options and fostering responsible tourism practices. Modeling Societal Fairness Focus on modeling Societal Fairness (S-Fairness) in tourism recommendations. Challenges faced by stakeholders due to tourism activities. Destination Sustainability Index Assigning a Sustainability Index (SF index) based on CO2 emissions, popularity, and seasonal demand. User study validates the SF index for sustainable city trip recommendations. Related Work Review of prior research on city trip recommendations and sustainable recommendations. Integration of personalization and sustainability in recommender systems. Data Extraction Sentences with key metrics or figures supporting the author's arguments are not provided in the content. Quotations No striking quotes supporting the author's key logics are present in the content. Further Questions How can TRS balance the interests of different stakeholders in sustainable tourism? What are the potential challenges in implementing the SF index for city trip recommendations? How can TRS adapt to changing travel trends and preferences for sustainable city trips?

Stats

Our methodology involves comprehensive data gathering on transportation modes and emissions. A user study validates our index, showcasing its practicality and efficacy in providing well-rounded and sustainable city trip recommendations.

Quotes

Key Insights Distilled From

Modeling Sustainable City Trips

by Ashm... at arxiv.org 03-28-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.18604.pdf

Deeper Inquiries

How can TRS balance the interests of different stakeholders in sustainable tourism?

In sustainable tourism, Recommender Systems (TRS) play a crucial role in balancing the interests of various stakeholders involved. To achieve this balance, TRS can consider the following strategies: Consumer Preferences: TRS should prioritize user preferences while recommending sustainable travel options. By understanding the preferences of travelers, TRS can offer personalized recommendations that align with their values and interests. Item Providers: TRS can work closely with item providers, such as hotels, tour operators, and transportation companies, to promote sustainable options. This collaboration can involve highlighting eco-friendly accommodations, responsible tour operators, and low-emission transportation modes. Platforms: TRS platforms can incorporate sustainability criteria into their algorithms, ensuring that recommendations prioritize destinations and activities with lower environmental impact. Platforms can also educate users about sustainable tourism practices and encourage responsible travel behavior. Society: TRS can consider the broader societal impact of tourism by promoting destinations that benefit local communities, preserve cultural heritage, and minimize negative environmental effects. By recommending off-the-beaten-path destinations and spreading tourist traffic evenly throughout the year, TRS can contribute to a more sustainable tourism model. By taking into account the interests of consumers, item providers, platforms, and society, TRS can play a pivotal role in promoting sustainable tourism practices and fostering a harmonious balance among stakeholders.

How can TRS adapt to changing travel trends and preferences for sustainable city trips?

To adapt to changing travel trends and preferences for sustainable city trips, TRS can implement the following strategies: Real-Time Data Analysis: TRS can utilize real-time data analysis to monitor changing travel trends, preferences, and environmental factors. By staying updated on the latest developments, TRS can adjust recommendations to align with current sustainability practices. Machine Learning Algorithms: Implementing machine learning algorithms in TRS can help identify patterns in user behavior and preferences. By analyzing user data, TRS can tailor recommendations to match evolving sustainability trends and preferences. Collaboration with Sustainable Partners: TRS can collaborate with sustainable partners, such as eco-friendly accommodations, green tour operators, and low-carbon transportation providers. By integrating these partners into the recommendation system, TRS can offer users a wider range of sustainable options. User Feedback and Reviews: Incorporating user feedback and reviews into the recommendation process can provide valuable insights into changing preferences and trends. TRS can use this feedback to continuously improve recommendations and adapt to evolving sustainability practices. By leveraging real-time data analysis, machine learning algorithms, sustainable partnerships, and user feedback, TRS can effectively adapt to changing travel trends and preferences for sustainable city trips.

What are the potential challenges in implementing the SF index for city trip recommendations?

Implementing the SF index for city trip recommendations may pose several challenges, including: Data Collection: Gathering comprehensive data on transportation emissions, destination popularity, and seasonal demand can be a complex and time-consuming process. Ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the data sources may present challenges. Weight Assignment: Determining the appropriate weights for the different components of the SF index, such as emissions, popularity, and seasonality, can be subjective and require careful consideration. Balancing these weights to reflect the interests of diverse stakeholders may be challenging. User Acceptance: Convincing users to prioritize sustainability in their travel decisions and accept recommendations based on the SF index may be a challenge. Users may have varying preferences and priorities when selecting travel destinations. Algorithm Complexity: Designing an algorithm that can effectively calculate the SF index and provide meaningful recommendations while considering multiple factors and stakeholder interests can be complex. Ensuring the algorithm's transparency and interpretability is essential. Scalability: Scaling the SF index for a large number of cities and users while maintaining accuracy and efficiency can be a challenge. Handling a diverse range of destinations and user preferences requires robust infrastructure and computational resources. Addressing these challenges through careful planning, stakeholder engagement, user feedback, and continuous refinement of the SF index can help overcome obstacles in implementing sustainable city trip recommendations.