Spatiotemporal Calibration of Event- and Frame-Based Cameras Using Continuous-Time Trajectories
核心概念
A novel spatiotemporal calibration framework, EF-Calib, is proposed to jointly calibrate the intrinsic parameters, extrinsic parameters, and time offset between event- and frame-based cameras without requiring any hardware synchronization.
要約
The paper presents EF-Calib, a novel spatiotemporal calibration framework for event- and frame-based cameras. The key highlights are:
-
A novel calibration pattern is designed that combines isotropic circles with checkerboard crosspoints, which enhances the recognition efficiency and accuracy for both event cameras and frame-based cameras.
-
An event-based feature recognizer is proposed that can accurately extract and refine the calibration pattern features from the asynchronous event stream.
-
A continuous-time trajectory representation using piece-wise B-splines is introduced, enabling the joint optimization of intrinsic parameters, extrinsic parameters, and time offset between the cameras.
-
Extensive experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of EF-Calib, including intrinsic calibration, extrinsic calibration, and time offset calibration. The results demonstrate that EF-Calib outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in intrinsic parameter estimation while also achieving high accuracy in extrinsic parameter and time offset estimation.
-
Two ablation studies are performed to analyze the contribution of key modules and the optimization strategy within EF-Calib, validating their effectiveness in improving calibration accuracy and efficiency.
Overall, EF-Calib provides a convenient and accurate toolbox for calibrating stereo vision systems that fuse event-based and frame-based cameras.
EF-Calib: Spatiotemporal Calibration of Event- and Frame-Based Cameras Using Continuous-Time Trajectories
統計
The paper reports the following key metrics:
Intrinsic parameter errors (fx, fy, cx, cy, k1, k2) and reprojection error (RPE) compared to ground truth.
Extrinsic parameter errors in rotation (er) and translation (et) compared to a frame-based calibration method.
Time offset (td) between event and frame-based cameras, with and without hardware synchronization.
引用
"EF-Calib provides a convenient and accurate toolbox for calibrating the system that fuses events and frames."
"Experimental results demonstrate that EF-Calib outperforms current methods by achieving the most accurate intrinsic parameters, comparable accuracy in extrinsic parameters to frame-based method, and precise time offset estimation."
深掘り質問
How could the proposed EF-Calib framework be extended to handle more than two cameras in a multi-camera system?
To extend the EF-Calib framework for multi-camera systems involving more than two cameras, several modifications and enhancements would be necessary. First, the calibration framework would need to incorporate a more complex model for the extrinsic parameters, allowing for the estimation of relative poses between multiple cameras. This could involve the use of a graph-based optimization approach, where each camera is treated as a node and the relative transformations between them as edges.
Additionally, the continuous-time trajectory representation could be adapted to accommodate multiple cameras by introducing a shared temporal reference or synchronization mechanism that aligns the event streams and frame captures from all cameras. This would require a robust method for handling time offsets not just between pairs of cameras but across the entire system, potentially leveraging the asynchronous nature of event cameras to create a unified timeline.
Moreover, the calibration pattern could be designed to include features that are easily detectable by all camera types involved, ensuring that each camera can contribute to the calibration process. The feature extraction and refinement stages would also need to be enhanced to handle the increased complexity of data from multiple cameras, possibly by employing advanced machine learning techniques to improve feature recognition and reduce noise.
Finally, extensive testing and validation would be essential to ensure that the extended EF-Calib framework maintains high accuracy and robustness across various configurations and environments, similar to the performance demonstrated in the original two-camera setup.
What are the potential challenges and considerations in developing an online, markerless calibration approach based on EF-Calib?
Developing an online, markerless calibration approach based on EF-Calib presents several challenges and considerations. One of the primary challenges is ensuring accurate feature detection and tracking in real-time without the aid of physical markers. This requires the implementation of robust algorithms capable of identifying and tracking features in dynamic environments, which can be significantly more complex than using predefined markers.
Another consideration is the need for effective noise suppression techniques to filter out irrelevant events generated by the event camera, especially in cluttered or rapidly changing scenes. The algorithms must be capable of distinguishing between useful features and background noise, which can be particularly challenging in environments with varying illumination conditions.
Additionally, the continuous-time trajectory representation must be adapted for real-time processing, ensuring that the optimization of camera poses can occur seamlessly as the camera moves. This may involve developing efficient computational methods to handle the increased data flow and complexity of calculations in an online setting.
Furthermore, the calibration process must be robust to changes in the environment, such as moving objects or varying lighting conditions, which could affect the visibility of features. Implementing adaptive algorithms that can adjust to these changes in real-time will be crucial for maintaining calibration accuracy.
Lastly, the integration of the online calibration system with existing computer vision applications, such as SLAM or object tracking, must be carefully designed to ensure compatibility and efficiency, allowing for smooth operation in practical scenarios.
How could the insights from EF-Calib's continuous-time trajectory representation be leveraged to improve other computer vision tasks beyond camera calibration, such as SLAM or object tracking?
The continuous-time trajectory representation introduced in EF-Calib can significantly enhance various computer vision tasks, including SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) and object tracking. By utilizing a continuous-time model, SLAM systems can achieve more accurate and smooth trajectory estimation, as the representation allows for the modeling of camera motion in a more granular manner. This can lead to improved handling of rapid movements and dynamic environments, where traditional discrete-time approaches may struggle.
In object tracking, the continuous-time trajectory can facilitate more precise predictions of object motion, enabling the tracking algorithms to adapt to changes in speed and direction more effectively. By integrating the continuous-time model with predictive algorithms, such as Kalman filters or particle filters, the tracking system can maintain higher accuracy even in the presence of occlusions or abrupt changes in the object's trajectory.
Moreover, the insights gained from the analytical derivatives provided by the continuous-time representation can be applied to optimize the motion estimation process in both SLAM and tracking tasks. This can enhance the efficiency of the optimization algorithms used in these applications, leading to faster convergence and reduced computational load.
Additionally, the ability to align event-based data with frame-based data in a continuous-time framework can improve the fusion of information from different sensors, leading to more robust and reliable perception systems. This is particularly beneficial in scenarios where both event cameras and traditional cameras are used, as it allows for the seamless integration of high temporal resolution data with high spatial resolution data.
Overall, the continuous-time trajectory representation from EF-Calib offers a versatile tool that can be adapted to enhance the performance and robustness of various computer vision applications beyond camera calibration.