Verifiable Privacy-Preserving Computing: Combining Cryptographic Techniques for Secure and Auditable Distributed Computations

核心概念

This work analyzes existing solutions that combine verifiability with privacy-preserving computations over distributed data, in order to preserve confidentiality and guarantee correctness at the same time.

要約

The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of existing solutions for Verifiable Privacy-Preserving Computations (VPPCs), which aim to provide both input privacy and public verifiability of the computation results. The authors classify the VPPC schemes into four main classes based on the underlying privacy-preserving computation technique: MPC-based, HE-based, DLT-based, and DP-based.

For each class, the authors discuss the different approaches used to achieve verifiability, such as non-succinct zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), succinct ZKPs, homomorphic MACs, and trusted execution environments. They analyze the security, privacy, and public verifiability properties of the schemes, as well as their efficiency and practical aspects.

The key insights from the analysis include:

• MPC-based schemes can provide security and public verifiability even when all parties are corrupted, but have higher communication and verification costs.
• HE-based schemes can be more efficient for outsourced computations, but require a trusted setup for the zk-SNARK proofs.
• DLT-based schemes are suitable for computations with varying participant groups, but are limited by the message size and verification time constraints of the shared ledger.
• DP-based schemes are significantly more efficient than the other approaches, but provide weaker privacy guarantees and only approximate correctness.

The authors also identify several underexposed topics, such as the need for input data authentication, reusability of intermediate results, and post-quantum security, which are important for the practical adoption of VPPC schemes.

統計

None.

引用

None.

抽出されたキーインサイト

Verifiable Privacy-Preserving Computing

by Tariq Bontek... 場所 arxiv.org 04-17-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.08248.pdf

深掘り質問

How can VPPC schemes be designed to provide both input data authentication and computation result verifiability in an efficient and practical manner?

Verifiable Privacy-Preserving Computing (VPPC) schemes can be designed to ensure both input data authentication and computation result verifiability by incorporating cryptographic techniques such as Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC). Here are some key strategies to achieve this:

Hybrid Approach: Combining ZKPs for input data authentication with MPC for computation result verifiability can provide a robust solution. ZKPs can be used to authenticate the input data without revealing sensitive information, while MPC ensures that the computation results are accurate and verifiable.

Secure Multi-Party Computation: Implementing MPC protocols that allow multiple parties to jointly compute a function over their private data while preserving confidentiality and ensuring correctness. By using techniques like secret sharing and secure computation, parties can collaborate without compromising data privacy.

Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Utilizing ZKPs to prove the validity of computations without revealing the actual data or intermediate steps. ZKPs can be used to verify that the computation was performed correctly based on the authenticated input data, providing a high level of assurance without compromising privacy.

Trusted Execution Environments: Leveraging trusted hardware environments to securely execute computations while protecting sensitive data. TEEs ensure that the computation is performed in a secure and isolated environment, enhancing the overall security of the VPPC scheme.

Post-Quantum Security: Considering the potential threat of quantum computing on cryptographic schemes, incorporating post-quantum secure primitives can enhance the resilience of VPPC schemes against future advancements in quantum computing.

By integrating these approaches and technologies, VPPC schemes can achieve a balance between input data authentication and computation result verifiability in an efficient and practical manner, ensuring both data privacy and computational integrity.

How can VPPC schemes be made resilient against the threat of quantum computing, and what are the trade-offs in terms of efficiency and practicality?

To make VPPC schemes resilient against the threat of quantum computing, several strategies can be employed:

Post-Quantum Cryptography: Transitioning to cryptographic algorithms and protocols that are resistant to quantum attacks, such as lattice-based cryptography, code-based cryptography, or multivariate cryptography. These post-quantum secure primitives can withstand attacks from quantum computers and ensure the long-term security of VPPC schemes.

Quantum-Secure ZKPs: Developing zero-knowledge proof systems that are quantum-resistant to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of computations in the presence of quantum adversaries. Quantum-secure ZKPs can provide verifiability while protecting sensitive information from quantum attacks.

Quantum-Resistant MPC: Implementing MPC protocols that are designed to withstand quantum attacks, ensuring that the privacy and security of the computation are maintained even in a quantum computing environment. By using quantum-resistant techniques in MPC, VPPC schemes can mitigate the risks posed by quantum adversaries.

Trade-offs in terms of efficiency and practicality when implementing quantum-resistant VPPC schemes include:

Computational Overhead: Post-quantum secure algorithms often require more computational resources and may be less efficient than their classical counterparts. This can lead to increased processing times and resource consumption in VPPC schemes.

Key Size and Communication Overhead: Quantum-resistant cryptographic schemes may have larger key sizes and increased communication overhead, impacting the overall efficiency of VPPC protocols. Balancing security with performance is crucial in designing quantum-resistant VPPC schemes.

Complexity and Implementation Challenges: Quantum-resistant algorithms can be more complex to implement and may require specialized knowledge and expertise. This complexity can introduce challenges in deployment and maintenance of VPPC systems.

By carefully considering these trade-offs and adopting quantum-resistant cryptographic techniques, VPPC schemes can enhance their resilience against quantum computing threats while maintaining efficiency and practicality in secure computations over private data.