核心概念
The author introduces HaluEval-Wild to evaluate LLM hallucinations in real-world scenarios, highlighting the need for reliability and trustworthiness in language models.
要約
The HaluEval-Wild benchmark addresses the challenge of LLM hallucinations by collecting challenging user queries from real-world interactions. It categorizes queries into distinct types and evaluates popular LLMs, revealing insights on model performance and reliability. The benchmark aims to enhance comprehension and improvement of language models in dynamic settings.
The study emphasizes the importance of balancing model performance with reliability, especially in critical domains like journalism and legal documentation. By introducing a novel approach to evaluating LLM hallucinations, the research contributes to advancing understanding and enhancing the robustness of language models.
Key points include:
- Introduction of HaluEval-Wild benchmark for evaluating LLM hallucinations.
- Collection of challenging user queries from real-world interactions.
- Categorization of queries into distinct types for fine-grained analysis.
- Evaluation of popular LLMs to highlight insights on model performance.
- Emphasis on balancing model effectiveness with reliability in critical domains.
統計
Hallucination rate of Alpaca 7B: 99.20%
Hallucination rate of GPT-4 Turbo: 18.64%
Average query length for different query types in HaluEval-Wild: OoS - 18.94 words, CR - 46.72 words, IC - 32.40 words, BM - 29.45 words, CE - 16.47 words
引用
"Models trained through distillation exhibit a higher tendency towards hallucinations."
"Balancing effectiveness with reliability is crucial in maintaining trust in language models."