Sustainable Soil Management Practices Enhance Soil Organic Carbon Stocks and Alter Soil Respiration Patterns

核心概念

Sustainable soil management practices are associated with higher soil organic carbon stocks and altered soil respiration patterns, including lower soil respiration trends and higher soil respiration magnitudes, compared to randomly selected sites.

要約

The study developed a data-driven ensemble machine learning model to predict soil respiration (Rs) at the global scale from 1991 to 2018 using soil temperature, soil moisture, and soil organic carbon as predictors. The model showed relatively high accuracy in predicting Rs after a spatial cross-validation strategy.

The key highlights and insights from the study are:

• The ensemble machine learning model revealed that soil temperature and soil moisture are the most important drivers of Rs, followed by soil organic carbon.
• Across sites where sustainable soil management (SSM) practices exist, the model predicted a non-significant trend of Rs over time, in contrast to a lower trend of Rs at randomly selected sites.
• Rs predictions were significantly higher across sites with SSM practices compared to randomly selected sites, despite similar soil moisture conditions.
• Areas with SSM practices had higher soil organic carbon stocks and lower soil temperatures compared to randomly selected sites.
• The results suggest that high magnitudes of Rs are not always indicative of poor soil health, and Rs should be interpreted in the context of soil management practices.
• The study provides a data-driven model to predict annual Rs globally that can be used to better understand the impact of SSM practices on soil health indicators.

統計

Soil respiration values ranged from a mean of 849 g C m-2 to a first quartile of 497 g C m-2.
Across sites with sustainable soil management practices, the model predicted a non-significant trend of Rs over time (p value > 0.05) in 101 out of 105 sites.
In the 4 sites with significant Rs trends, the model predicted an increase of 1.17 [CI95% 0.54, 1.80] g C m-2 yr-1.
Randomly selected sites predicted a lower Rs trend of 0.84 [CI95% 0.74, 0.94] g C m-2 yr-1.
Rs predictions were significantly higher across sites with sustainable soil management practices (1046.284 [CI95% 991.91, 1100.66] g C m-2) compared to randomly selected sites (979.52 [CI95% 977.43, 981.61] g C m-2).

引用

"Studies have emphasized that looking into the patterns of Rs, in response to SSM practices, is necessary for the conservation of the resource as none-sustainable forest management has been demonstrated to decrease C stocks."
"Our results support the positive implications of SSM practices increasing C stocks in response to Rs patterns and trends."

抽出されたキーインサイト

Soil respiration signals in response to sustainable soil management practices enhance soil organic carbon stocks

by Mario Guevar... 場所 arxiv.org 04-10-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.05737.pdf

深掘り質問

How can the insights from this study be used to inform sustainable land management policies and practices at regional or global scales?

The insights from this study can play a crucial role in informing sustainable land management policies and practices at regional or global scales by providing valuable information on the impact of sustainable soil management practices on soil health indicators. By understanding the relationship between soil respiration, soil organic carbon, soil moisture, and other factors, policymakers and land managers can make informed decisions to enhance soil health and productivity. The data-driven model developed in this study can be used to predict soil respiration trends, identify areas where sustainable soil management practices are effective, and guide the implementation of policies that promote sustainable land management practices.

What other soil health indicators, besides soil respiration, could be analyzed to further understand the impacts of sustainable soil management practices?

In addition to soil respiration, several other soil health indicators could be analyzed to further understand the impacts of sustainable soil management practices. These indicators include soil pH, nutrient levels (such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium), microbial activity, soil structure, compaction, and biodiversity. Analyzing these indicators can provide a comprehensive view of soil health and help assess the effectiveness of sustainable soil management practices in improving soil quality, fertility, and resilience. By considering a range of soil health indicators, stakeholders can gain a holistic understanding of the impact of their management practices on soil ecosystems.

What are the potential socioeconomic and environmental co-benefits of implementing sustainable soil management practices at scale?

Implementing sustainable soil management practices at scale can lead to a range of potential socioeconomic and environmental co-benefits. From a socioeconomic perspective, these practices can enhance agricultural productivity, increase crop yields, and improve food security. By maintaining healthy soils, farmers can reduce input costs, increase profitability, and ensure long-term sustainability of their operations. Additionally, sustainable soil management practices can create employment opportunities, support rural livelihoods, and contribute to economic development.
On the environmental front, implementing sustainable soil management practices can help mitigate climate change by sequestering carbon in the soil, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and enhancing soil resilience to extreme weather events. These practices can also improve water quality, reduce erosion, and protect biodiversity. Overall, sustainable soil management practices offer a win-win solution by promoting both environmental conservation and socioeconomic development.