Halekotte, L., Mentges, A., & Lichte, D. (2024). Do we practice what we preach? The dissonance between resilience understanding and measurement. [Insert Journal Name Upon Publication].
This article examines the discrepancy between the prevailing understanding of resilience as a capacity and the common practice of assessing it based on event-specific processes or outcomes. The authors argue for a shift towards assessing resilience as a capacity to better reflect its true meaning and enhance resilience management.
The authors conduct a critical review of existing literature on resilience, analyzing different definitions, assessment approaches, and management implications. They introduce the concept of a "resilience backbone" to illustrate the relationships between resilience properties, capacities, processes, and outcomes.
The authors advocate for understanding and assessing resilience as a capacity to enable continuous monitoring, proactive management, and a more comprehensive evaluation of a system's ability to handle diverse disruptions. They propose using multiple performance curves and property-based approaches to gain a more holistic view of resilience capacities.
This article highlights a crucial gap between theory and practice in resilience assessment, urging researchers and practitioners to adopt methods that align with the true meaning of resilience as a capacity.
The article primarily focuses on conceptual aspects of resilience assessment. Future research could explore specific methodologies for effectively measuring resilience capacities in various domains.
다른 언어로
소스 콘텐츠 기반
arxiv.org
더 깊은 질문