toplogo
로그인

Agent-FLAN: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Agent Tuning in Large Language Models


핵심 개념
Effective agent tuning in large language models is crucial for bridging the gap between open-sourced LLMs and API-based models.
초록
Introduction Language agents leverage LLMs for decision-making. Open-sourced LLMs excel in linguistic tasks but lag as agents. Key Observations Agent training data lacks alignment with model pretraining. LLMs exhibit varied learning speeds on agent task capabilities. Hallucination issues are prevalent in current approaches. Agent-FLAN Approach Aligns agent tuning to pretrain domain for better learning. Decomposes data based on model capabilities for balanced training. Introduces negative sample learning to mitigate hallucination issues. Results Agent-FLAN outperforms prior works by 3.5% on various agent evaluation datasets. Related Work Studies focus on LLMs as agents and fine-tuning methods.
통계
"LLMs exhibit different learning speeds on the capabilities required by agent tasks." "Agent-FLAN enables Llama2-7B to outperform prior best works by 3.5% across various agent evaluation datasets."
인용구
"Most agent training data is entangled with both format following and general reasoning." "By explicitly decomposing the training data along the basic capability aspects, each loss exhibits different convergence curves."

핵심 통찰 요약

by Zehui Chen,K... 게시일 arxiv.org 03-20-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.12881.pdf
Agent-FLAN

더 깊은 질문

How can Agent-FLAN's approach be applied to a wider range of benchmarks?

Agent-FLAN's approach can be extended to a broader set of benchmarks by adapting the methodology and techniques used in fine-tuning language models for agent tasks. To apply this approach to a wider range of benchmarks, the following steps can be taken: Dataset Selection: Choose diverse datasets that cover various aspects of agent tasks, including different domains, formats, and complexities. Ensure that the training corpus represents a wide spectrum of scenarios that an agent might encounter. Decomposition and Redesign: Similar to how Agent-FLAN decomposed the training data along different capabilities like reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and instruction following, this decomposition should align with the specific requirements of each benchmark task. Data Balancing: Balance the training data based on the learning speeds observed for each capability required by the benchmark tasks. This will ensure that the model learns effectively across all necessary competencies. Negative Sample Learning: Curate negative samples specific to each benchmark task to address hallucination issues effectively. By providing explicit supervision on when not to generate certain responses or actions, these negative samples can help mitigate hallucination problems in diverse scenarios. Model Scaling Law Analysis: Investigate how scaling laws apply to different benchmarks in terms of both data scaling (amount of training data) and model scaling (size). Understanding how performance varies with changes in these factors will guide optimization strategies for different benchmarks. By customizing Agent-FLAN's approach according to the unique characteristics and requirements of various benchmarks while incorporating these key elements, it can be successfully applied across a wider range of evaluation tasks.

How counterarguments exist against the necessity of aligning agent corpus into chat domain?

Counterarguments against aligning agent corpus into chat domain may include: Overfitting Concerns: Critics may argue that focusing too much on aligning agent corpus with natural conversation could lead to overfitting on specific dialogue patterns or formats present in chat-based datasets. Generalization Challenges: Some may contend that agents trained solely on chat-based corpora might struggle when faced with novel or complex real-world scenarios outside typical conversational contexts. Task-Specific Limitations: Opponents might suggest that certain specialized tasks require adherence to particular formats or structures not found in general conversation settings; therefore, alignment with chat domain could hinder performance on such tasks. Resource Intensiveness: There could be concerns about resource-intensive nature associated with reformatting large amounts of existing data into natural conversation style which might not always yield significant improvements in performance. While these counterarguments highlight potential drawbacks or limitations associated with exclusively aligning agent corpus into chat domain, it is essential to consider them alongside benefits such as improved generalizability across diverse applications and enhanced adaptability for real-world use cases.

How can hallucination issues be addressed in other applications beyond language models?

Hallucination issues encountered in other applications beyond language models can be mitigated through several strategies: Explicit Supervision: Provide explicit supervision during training by introducing negative samples representing incorrect outputs or actions based on user queries or system prompts. 2 .Diverse Training Data: Curate diverse datasets covering various scenarios where hallucinations are likely occur; train models using this varied dataset mix helps improve robustness against generating inaccurate responses. 3 .Adversarial Training: Incorporate adversarial examples during training process which challenge model’s ability handle unexpected inputs leading reduced likelihood generating hallucinatory outputs 4 .Ensemble Methods: Employ ensemble methods combining multiple models trained differently; leveraging diversity among individual models reduces chances producing consistent hallucinations By implementing these approaches tailored specifically towards addressing hallucination challenges within respective application domains—such as robotics systems healthcare diagnostics—it is possible enhance reliability effectiveness AI systems operating those areas while minimizing risks posed by erroneous predictions generated due presence false information known as “hallucinations.”
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star