Optimizing Risk-Sensitive Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Balancing Expected Logarithmic Returns and Variance

Belangrijkste concepten

The paper studies a risk-sensitive decision-making problem under uncertainty, where the objective is to balance the expected logarithmic return and the variance of the logarithmic return.

Samenvatting

The paper formulates a risk-sensitive decision-making problem under uncertainty as a stochastic control problem. The decision-maker faces a multi-stage process where they choose among deterministic and stochastic alternatives, with the goal of maximizing an objective function that considers both the expected logarithmic return and the variance of the logarithmic return.
The key highlights and insights are:

The authors provide an equivalent optimization problem and derive the necessary optimality conditions for the risk-sensitive decision-making problem.
Two illustrative examples are presented to demonstrate the impact of the risk-aversion parameter on the optimal decision:

Optimal betting problem: The optimal allocation to the risky alternative decreases as the risk-aversion parameter increases.
Retail inventory management problem: The optimal allocation to the two product categories can be determined, with one category potentially prioritized to manage risk and enhance returns.

The analysis shows that the log-variance can be a convex function in certain cases, making the overall optimization problem a concave program and the necessary conditions also sufficient.
The framework provides a robust approach for decision-makers facing uncertain environments, balancing expected returns and risk, with applications in finance, operations management, and beyond.

Statistieken

None.

Citaten

None.

Belangrijkste Inzichten Gedestilleerd Uit

On Risk-Sensitive Decision Making Under Uncertainty

by Chung-Han Hs... om arxiv.org 04-23-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.13371.pdf

Diepere vragen

How can the proposed framework be extended to handle more complex decision-making scenarios, such as those with time-varying or correlated stochastic alternatives

The proposed framework can be extended to handle more complex decision-making scenarios by incorporating time-varying or correlated stochastic alternatives. To address time-varying scenarios, the model can be adapted to include dynamic programming techniques that account for changing parameters over time. This would involve updating the decision-making process at each stage based on the evolving conditions, allowing for more adaptive and responsive strategies.
In the case of correlated stochastic alternatives, the framework can be enhanced by introducing multivariate distributions to capture the interdependencies between different alternatives. By modeling the joint distribution of correlated variables, the decision-maker can make more informed choices that consider the relationships between different options. This extension would require advanced probabilistic modeling techniques to accurately represent the complex dependencies among the alternatives.
Overall, by incorporating time-varying dynamics and correlated stochastic alternatives, the framework can better reflect the intricacies of real-world decision-making scenarios, providing more robust and comprehensive solutions.

What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of the risk-sensitive objective function used in this study, and how could alternative formulations be explored

The risk-sensitive objective function used in this study, which combines expected log-growth and variance of log-growth, may have certain limitations and drawbacks that warrant consideration. One potential limitation is the sensitivity of the model to the risk-aversion parameter ρ. Depending on the chosen value of ρ, the optimization results may vary significantly, leading to potential biases in decision-making.
Another drawback could be the assumption of i.i.d. distributions for the stochastic alternatives, which may not always hold in practical scenarios. Real-world data often exhibit time dependencies and correlations that are not captured by simple i.i.d. assumptions. This limitation could affect the accuracy and applicability of the model to complex decision-making environments.
To address these limitations, alternative formulations of the risk-sensitive objective function could be explored. For example, incorporating higher moments of the distribution, such as skewness and kurtosis, could provide a more comprehensive view of risk beyond just variance. Additionally, integrating machine learning techniques to learn the risk preferences of decision-makers from data could lead to more personalized and adaptive risk-sensitive models.
Exploring different risk measures, such as Conditional-Value-at-Risk (CVaR) or Tail Value-at-Risk (TVaR), could also offer alternative perspectives on risk management. These measures capture the tail behavior of the distribution, providing insights into extreme risk scenarios that may be overlooked by traditional variance-based approaches.

What are the implications of this work for real-world decision-making in areas beyond finance and operations, such as healthcare, public policy, or environmental management

The implications of this work for real-world decision-making extend beyond finance and operations to various other domains, including healthcare, public policy, and environmental management.
In healthcare, the risk-sensitive decision-making framework can be applied to optimize treatment strategies, resource allocation, and patient outcomes. By considering both expected outcomes and the variability of results, healthcare providers can make more informed decisions that balance effectiveness with risk mitigation. This can lead to improved patient care, cost-effective treatments, and better healthcare delivery overall.
In public policy, the framework can help policymakers assess the impact of different policy interventions while accounting for uncertainties and risks. By incorporating risk-sensitive optimization, policymakers can evaluate the trade-offs between various policy options, considering both the expected benefits and the potential downside risks. This can lead to more robust and resilient policy decisions that account for uncertainty and variability in outcomes.
In environmental management, the framework can support decision-making related to natural resource management, climate change adaptation, and sustainability initiatives. By integrating risk-sensitive approaches, environmental managers can develop strategies that address the uncertainties and risks associated with environmental challenges. This can lead to more effective conservation efforts, resilient ecosystems, and sustainable practices that account for the complexities of the natural world.