toplogo
Inloggen

Uncertainty Quantification for DeepONets with Ensemble Kalman Inversion


Belangrijkste concepten
The author proposes an innovative approach using Ensemble Kalman Inversion for efficient uncertainty quantification in DeepONets, addressing challenges of noisy and limited data.
Samenvatting
The content discusses the importance of uncertainty quantification in DeepONets, introducing a novel method using Ensemble Kalman Inversion. It highlights the challenges faced in practical applications and showcases the effectiveness of the proposed methodology through various benchmark problems. The approach leverages EKI's advantages to efficiently train ensembles of DeepONets while providing informative uncertainty estimates for mission-critical applications with limited and noisy data.
Statistieken
EKI offers numerous advantages such as being derivative-free, noise-robust, highly parallelizable. The training output data is generated at 100 equally spaced locations along x ∈ [0, 1] for each corresponding output function s. For EKI, J = 5000 ensemble members are utilized. The mean relative error shows a 0.9% error in the mean prediction and a corresponding 1.4% uncertainty. On average, 98.5% of each truth sample fall within the two standard deviation confidence interval.
Citaten

Belangrijkste Inzichten Gedestilleerd Uit

by Andrew Penso... om arxiv.org 03-07-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.03444.pdf
Uncertainty quantification for deeponets with ensemble kalman inversion

Diepere vragen

How does the proposed EKI method compare to traditional Bayesian methods for uncertainty quantification

The proposed Ensemble Kalman Inversion (EKI) method offers several advantages over traditional Bayesian methods for uncertainty quantification in DeepONets. Efficiency: EKI is known for being derivative-free, noise-robust, highly parallelizable, and well-suited for high-dimensional parameter inference. This makes it computationally efficient and suitable for handling the large datasets and complex architectures often encountered in DeepONet applications. Scalability: EKI can efficiently handle ensembles of DeepONets while providing informative uncertainty estimates for the output of interest. Its ability to scale well with larger datasets and network architectures makes it a practical choice for uncertainty quantification tasks. Innovative Approach: The application of EKI in this context represents an innovative approach tailored specifically for operator learning with DeepONets. By leveraging the strengths of EKI, researchers can achieve efficient training and informative uncertainty estimates crucial for real-world applications. Parallelization: EKI's inherent parallelizability allows for faster computations across multiple processors or GPUs, enabling quicker convergence during training iterations compared to sequential Bayesian methods. Overall, the efficiency, scalability, innovative approach, and parallelization capabilities make the proposed EKI method a compelling choice for uncertainty quantification in DeepONets.

What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of using Ensemble Kalman Inversion for DeepONet uncertainty quantification

While Ensemble Kalman Inversion (EKI) offers several benefits as discussed above, there are also potential limitations or drawbacks associated with using this method for DeepONet uncertainty quantification: Choice of Hyperparameters: One limitation is related to determining appropriate hyperparameters such as the artificial dynamics covariance matrix Q in EKI. Selecting optimal values may require manual tuning or heuristic approaches which could impact the performance of the algorithm. Computational Complexity: Although EKI is designed to be computationally efficient and scalable, handling very large datasets or extremely high-dimensional parameter spaces may still pose challenges in terms of computational resources required. Sensitivity to Noise Levels: The effectiveness of EKI may vary based on noise levels present in the data used during training. High levels of noise could potentially affect the quality of uncertainty estimates provided by EKI. 4..Limited Exploration: Depending on how samples are drawn from input/output pairs at each iteration during mini-batching process might lead to limited exploration within certain regions leading towards suboptimal solutions 5..Convergence Issues: Ensuring convergence towards accurate estimations might be challenging due to noisy stopping criteria especially when dealing with mini-batch processing

How might the findings from this study impact other fields beyond machine learning

The findings from this study have implications beyond machine learning that extend into various fields where uncertain predictions play a critical role: 1..Scientific Research: In scientific research areas such as climate modeling or geophysics where predictive models rely on uncertain data inputs; utilizing techniques like Ensemble Kalman Inversion can enhance model reliability by providing robust uncertainty quantifications. 2..Engineering Applications: Industries like aerospace engineering or structural design heavily depend on accurate predictions amidst uncertainties; incorporating advanced UQ methods like those demonstrated here can improve decision-making processes. 3..Healthcare Sector: Medical diagnostics often involve interpreting uncertain results; implementing sophisticated UQ techniques could aid healthcare professionals in making informed decisions based on reliable predictions. 4..Financial Markets: Risk assessment models benefit greatly from precise estimation under uncertainties; adopting methodologies like Ensemble Kalman Inversion can enhance risk management strategies within financial institutions. 5..Environmental Studies: Climate change projections involve significant uncertainties; employing advanced UQ methods not only improves prediction accuracy but also aids policymakers in formulating effective mitigation strategies based on reliable forecasts.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star