toplogo
Inloggen

Using Flan-T5 for Reasoning and Extracting Emotion Causes in Conversations


Belangrijkste concepten
The core message of this paper is to propose a two-stage Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methodology for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) to accurately infer emotion states and causes in conversational contexts.
Samenvatting

The paper presents a two-stage approach for emotion cause extraction in conversations, using the Flan-T5 language model.

In the first stage (THORSTATE), the model is fine-tuned to infer the emotion state of a given utterance in the conversation context. In the second stage (THORCAUSE), the model is fine-tuned to infer the emotion caused by a source utterance towards the target utterance.

The authors also propose a Reasoning Revision (RR) technique, where the model is further fine-tuned by incorporating the predicted emotion state of the source utterance to better align the state-cause dependency.

The authors analyze the training data and report quantitative statistics on the emotion-cause pairs, their distance distribution, and the correlation between speaker states and caused emotions. They also provide an algorithm-based approach for correcting the predicted emotion-cause spans.

The final submission, based on the Flan-T5base model and the rule-based span correction technique, achieves 3rd, 4th, and 5th place in the official SemEval-2024 Task 3 evaluation.

edit_icon

Samenvatting aanpassen

edit_icon

Herschrijven met AI

edit_icon

Citaten genereren

translate_icon

Bron vertalen

visual_icon

Mindmap genereren

visit_icon

Bron bekijken

Statistieken
The training data (TRAINjson) contains 1,374 conversations with a total of 8,879 emotion-cause pairs. 51.86% of the pairs are self-caused, and 12.83% are caused by a different utterance. Most emotion-cause pairs (82.9%) have a distance of 0 or 1 utterance between the source and target.
Citaten
"Emotion expression is one of the essential traits of conversations. It may be self-related or caused by another speaker." "We exploit the existing three-hop reasoning (THOR) approach to perform large language model instruction-tuning for answering: emotion states (THORSTATE), and emotion caused by one speaker to the other (THORCAUSE)." "We equip THORCAUSE with the reasoning revision (RR) for devising a reasoning path in fine-tuning. In particular, we rely on the annotated speaker emotion states to revise reasoning path."

Belangrijkste Inzichten Gedestilleerd Uit

by Nicolay Rusn... om arxiv.org 04-05-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.03361.pdf
nicolay-r at SemEval-2024 Task 3

Diepere vragen

How can the proposed methodology be extended to handle more complex conversational scenarios, such as multi-party interactions or conversations with topic shifts

To extend the proposed methodology to handle more complex conversational scenarios, such as multi-party interactions or conversations with topic shifts, several adjustments and enhancements can be made: Multi-party Interactions: Introduce a mechanism to track and analyze the emotional states and causes across multiple speakers in a conversation. This would involve expanding the context representation to include contributions from all speakers and their interactions. Develop a method to identify and differentiate emotional causes originating from different speakers within the conversation. This could involve assigning unique identifiers to each speaker and tracking the emotional flow between them. Conversations with Topic Shifts: Implement a topic modeling component to detect shifts in conversation topics. This would help in contextualizing emotional causes within the specific subject being discussed. Adjust the reasoning paths within the Chain-of-Thought framework to account for topic shifts and ensure that emotional causes are appropriately linked to the relevant topics. Enhanced Contextual Understanding: Incorporate sentiment analysis techniques to capture the overall emotional tone of the conversation, which can provide additional context for understanding emotional causes. Utilize natural language processing models trained on diverse conversational datasets to improve the model's ability to handle varied conversational structures and topics. By integrating these enhancements, the methodology can be adapted to handle the complexities of multi-party interactions and conversations with topic shifts more effectively.

What other techniques could be explored to further improve the performance of the emotion cause extraction task, beyond the Chain-of-Thought and Reasoning Revision approaches

Beyond the Chain-of-Thought and Reasoning Revision approaches, several techniques can be explored to further enhance the performance of emotion cause extraction: Graph-based Models: Utilize graph neural networks to capture the relationships between utterances, speakers, and emotional causes in a conversation. This approach can effectively model the complex dependencies in conversational data. Transfer Learning: Pre-train the model on a large corpus of conversational data to learn general emotional patterns before fine-tuning on the specific emotion cause extraction task. This can help the model generalize better to unseen data. Ensemble Methods: Combine the predictions of multiple models trained with different architectures or hyperparameters to improve the overall performance. Ensemble methods can help mitigate individual model biases and errors. Attention Mechanisms: Implement attention mechanisms to focus on relevant parts of the conversation that are crucial for determining emotional causes. This can enhance the model's ability to extract meaningful information from the input data. By exploring these techniques in conjunction with the existing approaches, the performance of emotion cause extraction can be further optimized.

How can the insights gained from this work on emotion cause extraction be applied to other related tasks, such as empathy detection or emotional intelligence analysis in conversations

The insights gained from the work on emotion cause extraction can be applied to other related tasks, such as empathy detection or emotional intelligence analysis in conversations, in the following ways: Empathy Detection: Use the methodology's understanding of emotional states and causes to develop models that can detect empathetic responses in conversations. By analyzing the emotional cues and responses between speakers, the model can identify instances of empathy. Emotional Intelligence Analysis: Apply the methodology to assess emotional intelligence levels in conversational interactions. By examining how individuals express and respond to emotions, the model can provide insights into emotional awareness, empathy, and social skills. Behavioral Analysis: Extend the methodology to analyze behavioral patterns linked to emotional expressions in conversations. By correlating emotional causes with behavioral responses, the model can offer a comprehensive analysis of individuals' emotional and social behaviors. By leveraging the methodology's capabilities in understanding emotional nuances in conversations, these applications can contribute to the development of more sophisticated systems for empathy detection and emotional intelligence analysis.
0
star