inzicht - Social Choice Theory - # Deliberative Coalition Formation

Deliberative Coalition Formation for Change: Ensuring Success in Identifying Popular Proposals

Q: How can compromise transitions impact coalition formation dynamics differently than other types?

Compromise transitions in coalition formation dynamics play a crucial role in facilitating consensus-building and decision-making. Unlike single-agent or follow transitions, compromise transitions involve agents from different coalitions coming together to form a new coalition around a proposal that is agreeable to all parties involved. This type of transition allows for the merging of divergent viewpoints and preferences, leading to a more inclusive and comprehensive decision-making process. One key impact of compromise transitions is their ability to bridge gaps between conflicting factions within a deliberative group. By encouraging agents to find common ground and reach mutually beneficial agreements, compromise transitions promote cooperation and collaboration among participants. This fosters a sense of unity and shared purpose, ultimately strengthening the overall cohesion of the coalition. Furthermore, compromise transitions can lead to innovative solutions that incorporate diverse perspectives and expertise from multiple stakeholders. By combining insights from different groups, these transitions have the potential to generate novel ideas and approaches that may not have been considered otherwise. This diversity in thinking enhances the quality of decisions made during the deliberation process. Overall, compromise transitions contribute significantly to creating an environment where varying opinions are respected, valued, and integrated into the decision-making process. They promote inclusivity, foster constructive dialogue, and pave the way for reaching consensus on complex issues through collaborative efforts.

Belangrijkste concepten

The authors explore the dynamics of forming coalitions around proposals to identify popular alternatives, ensuring successful deliberation processes.

Samenvatting

The study focuses on coalition formation dynamics in identifying widely supported proposals, emphasizing the importance of successful deliberation processes. The authors analyze various transitions like single-agent, follow, merge, and compromise to understand their impact on achieving consensus. They provide theoretical foundations for democratic decision-making support systems.

Samenvatting aanpassen

Herschrijven met AI

Citaten genereren

Bron vertalen

Naar een andere taal

Mindmap genereren

vanuit de broninhoud

Bron bekijken

arxiv.org

Statistieken

We study a setting where a community wishes to identify a strongly supported proposal from a space of alternatives.
Our results provide theoretical foundations for the analysis of deliberative processes.
Earlier versions of this article have been accepted for presentation at conferences.
Edith Elkind was supported by the ERC Starting Grant ACCORD (GA 639945).
Davide Grossi was supported by the Hybrid Intelligence Center funded by the Dutch Ministry of Education.
Nimrod Talmon was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (ISF; Grant No. 630/19).

Citaten

"We describe a deliberation process in which agents dynamically form coalitions around proposals that they prefer over the status quo."
"Our results provide theoretical foundations for the analysis of deliberative processes such as those in online systems for democratic deliberation support."

Belangrijkste Inzichten Gedestilleerd Uit

United for Change

by Edith Elkind... om arxiv.org 03-08-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.08031.pdf

Diepere vragen

How can compromise transitions impact coalition formation dynamics differently than other types?

Compromise transitions in coalition formation dynamics play a crucial role in facilitating consensus-building and decision-making. Unlike single-agent or follow transitions, compromise transitions involve agents from different coalitions coming together to form a new coalition around a proposal that is agreeable to all parties involved. This type of transition allows for the merging of divergent viewpoints and preferences, leading to a more inclusive and comprehensive decision-making process.
One key impact of compromise transitions is their ability to bridge gaps between conflicting factions within a deliberative group. By encouraging agents to find common ground and reach mutually beneficial agreements, compromise transitions promote cooperation and collaboration among participants. This fosters a sense of unity and shared purpose, ultimately strengthening the overall cohesion of the coalition.
Furthermore, compromise transitions can lead to innovative solutions that incorporate diverse perspectives and expertise from multiple stakeholders. By combining insights from different groups, these transitions have the potential to generate novel ideas and approaches that may not have been considered otherwise. This diversity in thinking enhances the quality of decisions made during the deliberation process.
Overall, compromise transitions contribute significantly to creating an environment where varying opinions are respected, valued, and integrated into the decision-making process. They promote inclusivity, foster constructive dialogue, and pave the way for reaching consensus on complex issues through collaborative efforts.

What are the implications of successful deliberations on decision-making processes?

Successful deliberations have profound implications for decision-making processes across various contexts. When a deliberative process culminates in identifying proposals with significant support (most-approved alternatives), it signifies that participants have engaged meaningfully with each other's viewpoints, reached common ground on preferred options, and achieved consensus on potential solutions.
One major implication is enhanced legitimacy in decision-making outcomes. Successful deliberations validate the choices made by demonstrating broad-based support for specific proposals or courses of action. This legitimacy stems from active participation by stakeholders who feel heard and represented throughout the deliberative process.
Moreover, successful deliberations often result in more informed decisions as they encourage thorough exploration of various perspectives, evidence-based arguments...

How do real-world applications like LiquidFeedback...align with theoretical framework presented?

Real-world applications such as LiquidFeedback...are designed based on principles outlined in computational social choice theory...The theoretical framework presented in academic research provides valuable insights into how collective decisions can be made effectively through structured processes like online platforms...
In particular,...applications align with concepts discussed such as coalition formation dynamics,...deliberation success criteria,...
By incorporating features inspired by theoretical models,...platforms aim to facilitate democratic decision-making...through mechanisms like proposal formulation,...coalition building,...
Overall,...real-world applications leverage foundational theories...to create practical tools that enhance participatory democracy..., transparency..., accountability..., thereby bridging theory with application for effective governance....