toplogo
Entrar

Survey on Characterization of Semantic Change: Understanding Word Evolution


Conceitos essenciais
The author explores the evolution of language through semantic changes, emphasizing the importance of understanding and characterizing these changes for various applications in computational linguistics.
Resumo

The content delves into the continuous evolution of languages through neologisms and semantic changes, highlighting the significance of interpreting words accurately. It discusses various factors driving language change, including phonological, lexical, syntactic, and semantic alterations. The emergence of computational linguistics has revolutionized the analysis of vast textual data to detect subtle properties in language with unprecedented accuracy and efficiency. The study also addresses the impact of semantic changes on applications like sentiment analysis and emphasizes the need for continuous updates in NLP models to account for evolving language trends.

edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Estatísticas
"Understanding the meaning of words is vital for interpreting texts coming from different cultures (regionalism or slang), domains (e.g., technical terms), or periods." "Semantic changes can potentially impact the quality of outcomes in computational linguistics algorithms such as translation, information retrieval, question answering, etc." "Several approaches propose methods to detect semantic changes with good precision."
Citações
"Live languages continuously evolve to integrate cultural change." "Understanding the meaning of words is vital for interpreting texts from different cultures or periods." "Semantic drift influences how words adapt to evolving cultural contexts."

Principais Insights Extraídos De

by Jade... às arxiv.org 03-01-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.19088.pdf
Survey in Characterization of Semantic Change

Perguntas Mais Profundas

How does semantic change impact cross-cultural communication?

Semantic change can have a significant impact on cross-cultural communication by leading to misunderstandings and misinterpretations. When words undergo shifts in meaning, especially across different languages or cultural contexts, it can result in confusion or ambiguity in communication. For example, a word that has evolved to have a more positive connotation in one culture may still carry its original negative meaning in another culture. This discrepancy can lead to miscommunication and hinder effective interaction between individuals from different backgrounds.

What are potential drawbacks of relying solely on frequency-based methods for detecting semantic change?

Relying solely on frequency-based methods for detecting semantic change has several drawbacks. One major limitation is the inability of these methods to capture nuances in word meanings beyond simple co-occurrence patterns. Frequency-based approaches may struggle with polysemy, where words have multiple meanings, as they often treat all occurrences of a word as having the same sense. Additionally, these methods may not be able to differentiate between subtle changes like sense broadening or narrowing based on frequency alone. They also lack the ability to consider contextual factors that influence semantic shifts.

How can advancements in word embeddings improve the characterization of semantic shifts?

Advancements in word embeddings offer promising opportunities for improving the characterization of semantic shifts. Word embeddings provide dense vector representations that capture relationships between words based on their usage context within large corpora of text data. By leveraging advanced embedding models like BERT or ELMO, which incorporate contextual information during training, researchers can better understand how word meanings evolve over time and across different contexts. These sophisticated embedding models allow for more nuanced analyses of semantic changes by considering not just individual words but also their surrounding context and syntactic structures. Furthermore, techniques such as contrastive learning and pre-training objectives focused on reducing distances between similar senses can enhance the isotropic orientation and sense similarity captured by embeddings. Overall, advancements in word embeddings enable researchers to delve deeper into characterizing complex semantic shifts with greater accuracy and granularity than traditional frequency-based methods would allow.
0
star