аналитика - Language Models Fairness - # Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models

Addressing Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey

Q: How can we develop fairness notions that are specific to the unique characteristics and applications of large language models?

Fairness notions specific to large language models (LLMs) need to consider the intricacies of language processing and the potential biases that can arise. One approach is to tailor fairness metrics to the unique challenges posed by LLMs, such as embedding-based metrics that analyze biases in word associations or generation-based metrics that assess biases in text generation. Additionally, considering the context in which LLMs are used is crucial. For example, in applications like chatbots or sentiment analysis, fairness notions may need to focus on reducing stereotypes or ensuring equitable treatment across different demographic groups. Developing fairness notions specific to LLMs requires a deep understanding of how biases manifest in language models and the impact they can have on real-world outcomes.

Q: How can we leverage the rapid advancements in large language models to address societal biases and promote equitable outcomes across diverse domains?

The rapid advancements in large language models present an opportunity to address societal biases and promote equitable outcomes across diverse domains. One way to leverage these advancements is by incorporating bias mitigation techniques directly into the training process of LLMs. Techniques such as data augmentation, prompt tuning, and loss function modification can help reduce biases in the models. Additionally, post-processing methods like model editing and decoding modification can further refine the outputs of LLMs to ensure fairness. By integrating these techniques into the development and deployment of LLMs, we can harness their capabilities to combat biases and promote fairness in various applications.

Q: What are the potential trade-offs between model performance and fairness, and how can we systematically optimize for both objectives?

There are inherent trade-offs between model performance and fairness when implementing bias mitigation techniques in large language models. For example, modifying the loss function to prioritize fairness may impact the overall accuracy or efficiency of the model. Similarly, post-processing methods that focus on rewriting or editing the model's outputs may introduce constraints that affect the naturalness or fluency of the generated text. To systematically optimize for both objectives, a balanced approach is necessary. This can involve fine-tuning the parameters of bias mitigation techniques to find an optimal trade-off between performance and fairness. Additionally, incorporating fairness constraints into the model training process from the outset can help ensure that the model learns to prioritize equitable outcomes without sacrificing performance. Regular evaluation and monitoring of the model's performance and fairness metrics can also guide adjustments to strike the right balance between the two objectives.

Основные понятия

This survey provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in addressing bias and promoting fairness in large language models (LLMs). It explores definitions of fairness, techniques for quantifying bias, and algorithms for mitigating bias at different stages of the LLM workflow. The survey also summarizes available resources, including toolkits and datasets, to facilitate further research and development of fair LLMs.

Аннотация

This survey presents a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on fairness in large language models (LLMs). It begins by introducing the fundamentals of LLMs and the factors that contribute to bias in these models, such as training data bias, embedding bias, and label bias.

The survey then delves into the definitions of fairness in machine learning, including group fairness and individual fairness, and discusses the necessary adaptations to address linguistic challenges when defining bias in the context of LLMs.

Next, the survey categorizes and discusses various metrics for quantifying bias in LLMs, including embedding-based metrics, probability-based metrics, and generation-based metrics. These metrics provide a systematic approach to measuring and assessing bias in LLMs.

The survey then presents a detailed review of algorithms for mitigating bias in LLMs, categorizing them into four stages: pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing. These techniques aim to address bias at different points in the LLM workflow, ranging from data augmentation and prompt tuning to loss function modification and model editing.

Furthermore, the survey compiles and summarizes the available resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets. These resources are categorized based on their suitability for different types of bias metrics, providing a comprehensive reference for researchers and practitioners.

Finally, the survey discusses the current challenges and future research directions in the field of fairness in LLMs, such as formulating fairness notions, balancing performance and fairness, and developing more tailored datasets.

Overall, this survey offers a valuable and comprehensive resource for understanding the current state of research on fairness in LLMs, and it provides a roadmap for future advancements in this important and rapidly evolving field.

Customize Summary

Rewrite with AI

Generate Citations

Translate Source

To Another Language

Generate MindMap

from source content

Visit Source

arxiv.org

Статистика

"Large language models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in addressing problems across diverse domains, ranging from chatbots to medical diagnoses and financial advisory."
"Consequently, they could lead to discrimination against certain populations, especially in socially sensitive applications, across various dimensions such as race, age, gender, nationality, occupation, and religion."

Цитаты

"Fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques."
"Despite their considerable achievements, LLMs may face fairness concerns stemming from biases inherited from the real-world and even exacerbate them."
"The lack of a clear framework mapping these fairness notions to their corresponding methodologies complicates the design of algorithms for future fair LLMs."

Ключевые выводы из

Fairness in Large Language Models

by Zhibo Chu,Zi... в arxiv.org 04-03-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.01349.pdf

Дополнительные вопросы

How can we develop fairness notions that are specific to the unique characteristics and applications of large language models?

Fairness notions specific to large language models (LLMs) need to consider the intricacies of language processing and the potential biases that can arise. One approach is to tailor fairness metrics to the unique challenges posed by LLMs, such as embedding-based metrics that analyze biases in word associations or generation-based metrics that assess biases in text generation. Additionally, considering the context in which LLMs are used is crucial. For example, in applications like chatbots or sentiment analysis, fairness notions may need to focus on reducing stereotypes or ensuring equitable treatment across different demographic groups. Developing fairness notions specific to LLMs requires a deep understanding of how biases manifest in language models and the impact they can have on real-world outcomes.

How can we leverage the rapid advancements in large language models to address societal biases and promote equitable outcomes across diverse domains?

The rapid advancements in large language models present an opportunity to address societal biases and promote equitable outcomes across diverse domains. One way to leverage these advancements is by incorporating bias mitigation techniques directly into the training process of LLMs. Techniques such as data augmentation, prompt tuning, and loss function modification can help reduce biases in the models. Additionally, post-processing methods like model editing and decoding modification can further refine the outputs of LLMs to ensure fairness. By integrating these techniques into the development and deployment of LLMs, we can harness their capabilities to combat biases and promote fairness in various applications.

What are the potential trade-offs between model performance and fairness, and how can we systematically optimize for both objectives?

There are inherent trade-offs between model performance and fairness when implementing bias mitigation techniques in large language models. For example, modifying the loss function to prioritize fairness may impact the overall accuracy or efficiency of the model. Similarly, post-processing methods that focus on rewriting or editing the model's outputs may introduce constraints that affect the naturalness or fluency of the generated text.
To systematically optimize for both objectives, a balanced approach is necessary. This can involve fine-tuning the parameters of bias mitigation techniques to find an optimal trade-off between performance and fairness. Additionally, incorporating fairness constraints into the model training process from the outset can help ensure that the model learns to prioritize equitable outcomes without sacrificing performance. Regular evaluation and monitoring of the model's performance and fairness metrics can also guide adjustments to strike the right balance between the two objectives.