toplogo
Logga in

Private Count Release: A Simple and Scalable Approach for Private Data Analytics by Ryan Rogers


Centrala begrepp
The author presents a novel approach for releasing accurate counts with differential privacy, highlighting the inefficiencies of existing methods that rely on user contribution bounds.
Sammanfattning

The content discusses a new method for private data analytics focusing on differential privacy. It compares the proposed approach with existing systems like Plume, emphasizing the importance of accurate contribution bounds. The system aims to release accurate counts without relying on strict user contribution limits, offering scalability and ease of implementation across various datasets. By utilizing an Unknown Domain Gumbel mechanism, the system iteratively finds high counts in a dataset while maintaining privacy guarantees. The approach ensures minimal hyperparameter tuning and efficient results on publicly available datasets. The content also delves into concentrated differential privacy, approximate CDP mechanisms, and the Gaussian Mechanism's role in ensuring privacy. Overall, the Private Count Release (PCR) system offers a practical solution for data analytics tasks with differential privacy requirements.

edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Statistik
"more than 95% of counts had a relative error below 50%" "the ℓ∞-sensitivity bound can be enforced when releasing the counts" "we use parameters ε∗ = 0.0005, δ∗ = 10−11, and ¯k = 10,000 in all experiments" "Plume uses a contribution bound of 1 when using either the 95th or 99th percentile" "ρ ∈ {0.1, 0.5, 1.0} and δ = 10−6 averaged over 10 independent trials"
Citat
"We hope that this approach will help differential privacy scale to many different data analytics applications." "Perhaps hidden in each differential privacy deployment is the privacy that is consumed in making decisions about these hyperparameters." "The accuracy of Plume crucially relies on setting the correct contribution bound."

Viktiga insikter från

by Ryan Rogers arxiv.org 03-11-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.05073.pdf
Private Count Release

Djupare frågor

How can PCR's adaptability impact its performance compared to systems with fixed parameters

PCR's adaptability can significantly impact its performance compared to systems with fixed parameters. By allowing for minimal hyperparameter tuning and the ability to adjust privacy parameters based on prior outcomes through a privacy filter, PCR can dynamically optimize its noise levels and privacy budget allocation. This adaptability ensures that PCR can efficiently handle various datasets without the need for extensive manual parameter adjustments. In contrast, systems with fixed parameters may struggle to achieve optimal results across different use cases or data scenarios due to their rigid settings.

What are the potential drawbacks of not setting accurate contribution bounds as discussed in Plume

The potential drawbacks of not setting accurate contribution bounds as discussed in Plume include compromised accuracy and increased risk of releasing noisy or misleading results. Contribution bounds play a crucial role in differential privacy by limiting the number of modifications each user can make to the dataset, thereby controlling the amount of noise added during data release. If inaccurate contribution bounds are set, it could lead to biased counts, reduced result accuracy, and potentially violate differential privacy guarantees. Without precise contribution bounding, there is a higher chance of releasing erroneous information that does not reflect the true underlying data distribution.

How might advancements in noise reduction algorithms further enhance PCR's capabilities

Advancements in noise reduction algorithms have the potential to further enhance PCR's capabilities by improving the accuracy and efficiency of count releases while maintaining differential privacy guarantees. These advancements allow for more precise control over noise levels added to released counts based on specific target relative errors or other criteria. By incorporating techniques like Brownian Noise Reduction into PCR, users can determine optimal noise levels tailored to individual counts' characteristics within a dataset. This adaptive approach ensures that PCR can provide more accurate results with minimal distortion from added noise, ultimately enhancing its overall performance in private data analytics tasks.
0
star