Modeling Opinion Dynamics and Belief Change in Social Networks using Subjective Logic

แนวคิดหลัก

This work investigates the use of subjective logic to model opinions and belief change in social networks, proposing a subjective logic belief/opinion update function to represent belief change as communication occurs in social networks.

บทคัดย่อ

The authors propose a model for social networks using elements of subjective logic, such as multinomial opinions, trust opinions, and belief fusion operators. They introduce a belief/opinion update function that uses subjective logic's trust discount and belief fusion to represent belief change in social networks.
The authors find that an update function with belief fusion from subjective logic does not have ideal properties, such as weak convergence and non-increasing uncertainty, to model a rational update in a social network. However, they show that an update function with cumulative belief fusion can represent different scenarios not described in previous work, such as consensus, balanced opposite, and unbalanced opposite opinions among agents.
The key insights are:

Consensus case: Agents with agreeing or disagreeing opinions will accumulate evidence and converge to complete certainty about the proposition.

Balanced opposite case: Agents with exactly opposite opinions will converge to complete indecision about the proposition.

Unbalanced opposite case: Agents with conflicting but unbalanced opinions will either radicalize or converge to a non-radical point, depending on the initial distance between their opinions.

The authors suggest that the update function with cumulative belief fusion has the potential to model belief dynamics in social networks that were not captured by previous models.

สถิติ

None.

คำพูด

None.

ข้อมูลเชิงลึกที่สำคัญจาก

Opinion Update in a Subjective Logic Model for Social Networks

by Mári... ที่ arxiv.org 04-24-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.14789.pdf

สอบถามเพิ่มเติม

How can the update function with cumulative belief fusion be formally analyzed to better understand the conditions for radicalization versus convergence to a non-radical point

To formally analyze the update function with cumulative belief fusion and understand the conditions for radicalization versus convergence to a non-radical point, we can delve into the mathematical properties of the function.

Stability Analysis: One approach is to analyze the stability of the system by examining the fixed points of the update function. By studying the equilibrium points where the opinions of agents do not change over time, we can determine the conditions under which radicalization or convergence occurs. This analysis can involve linearization around fixed points and investigating the eigenvalues of the system.

Bifurcation Analysis: Bifurcation theory can be applied to study how the behavior of the system changes as parameters vary. By identifying bifurcation points, where qualitative changes in the dynamics occur, we can understand the transition between radicalization and convergence.

Phase Space Analysis: Representing the system in a multidimensional phase space can provide insights into the trajectories of opinions over time. By visualizing the dynamics of the system, we can observe patterns of behavior and identify regions corresponding to radicalization or convergence.

Sensitivity Analysis: Examining the sensitivity of the system to initial conditions and parameters can reveal how small changes can lead to different outcomes. Sensitivity analysis can help identify critical factors that influence the dynamics of opinion formation in social networks.

By applying these analytical techniques, we can gain a deeper understanding of the update function with cumulative belief fusion and elucidate the conditions under which radicalization or convergence occurs in social networks.

What other properties or behaviors of the update function could be explored to make it more suitable for modeling realistic opinion dynamics in social networks

To enhance the suitability of the update function for modeling realistic opinion dynamics in social networks, several properties and behaviors could be further explored:

Incorporating Feedback Mechanisms: Introducing feedback loops where agents update their opinions based on the reactions of others can capture the iterative nature of opinion formation in social networks.

Dynamic Trust Levels: Modeling trust as a dynamic variable that evolves over time based on interactions and information exchange can provide a more realistic representation of how opinions are influenced in social networks.

Network Structure Analysis: Considering the underlying network structure and how it influences the spread of opinions can add complexity to the model. Exploring concepts like network centrality and influence propagation can enhance the realism of the opinion dynamics.

Temporal Dynamics: Incorporating temporal aspects such as memory effects, recency bias, and trend analysis can capture how opinions evolve over time in response to changing circumstances and external events.

Behavioral Biases: Integrating cognitive biases and heuristics that affect decision-making processes can make the model more psychologically realistic. Exploring confirmation bias, anchoring effects, and group polarization can add depth to the opinion dynamics.

By exploring these additional properties and behaviors, the update function can be refined to better capture the nuanced dynamics of opinion formation and change in social networks.

How could the model be extended to incorporate other factors that influence opinion formation and change, such as individual biases, social influence, or external events

To extend the model and incorporate other factors influencing opinion formation and change in social networks, the following aspects could be considered:

Individual Biases: Introducing individual biases such as confirmation bias, availability heuristic, and social desirability bias can provide a more nuanced understanding of how personal beliefs shape opinions in social networks.

Social Influence Mechanisms: Including mechanisms for social influence like homophily, social comparison, and social contagion can elucidate how interactions with others impact opinion dynamics.

External Events and Information: Integrating external events, news, and information into the model can simulate the effect of real-world events on opinion formation. This can involve incorporating sentiment analysis of news articles, social media trends, and public discourse.

Group Dynamics: Exploring group dynamics such as group polarization, echo chambers, and opinion leaders can shed light on how opinions evolve within social groups and communities.

Emotional Factors: Considering emotional factors like emotional contagion, empathy, and emotional responses to stimuli can add a psychological dimension to the model, reflecting the emotional aspects of opinion formation.

By extending the model to encompass these factors, the dynamics of opinion formation in social networks can be more comprehensively captured, leading to a more realistic and insightful representation of opinion dynamics.