toplogo
ลงชื่อเข้าใช้

Accelerating Sampling and Aggregation Operations in GNN Frameworks with GPU Initiated Direct Storage Accesses


แนวคิดหลัก
The authors propose the GIDS dataloader to address challenges in training large-scale graphs by leveraging GPU-oriented techniques for efficient hardware resource utilization.
บทคัดย่อ
The paper introduces the GIDS dataloader to optimize GNN training on large-scale graphs by utilizing GPU-initiated direct storage access. It addresses challenges of memory capacity constraints, storage access bottlenecks, and CPU-GPU resource utilization. The dynamic storage access accumulator and constant CPU buffer are key components enhancing performance. The study evaluates the impact of these components on SSD bandwidth utilization, showing significant improvements in PCIe ingress bandwidth with the dynamic storage access accumulator. The constant CPU buffer further enhances performance by redirecting storage accesses and reducing SSD bandwidth usage. Overall, the GIDS dataloader offers a comprehensive solution for accelerating sampling and aggregation operations in GNN frameworks through innovative techniques that optimize hardware resource utilization.
สถิติ
Our evaluation using a single GPU on terabyte-scale GNN datasets shows that the GIDS dataloader accelerates the overall DGL GNN training pipeline by up to 582× when compared to the current, state-of-the-art DGL dataloader. The peak SSD bandwidth is approximately 5.8 GB/s for Intel Optane SSDs. The achieved SSD bandwidth with different numbers of overlapping accesses was accurately predicted by our model. BaM achieves PCIe ingress bandwidths of 7.6 GB/s, 9.4 GB/s, and 10.1 GB/s for batch sizes of 32, 64, and 128 respectively. With the accumulator, BaM can achieve 9.8 GB/s, 10.4 GB/s, and 10.6 GB/s which is much closer to the peak bandwidth.
คำพูด
"The number of concurrent storage access requests can vary based on sampling parameters or hardware configuration." "To maintain sufficient overlapping storage accesses for any environment, GIDS features a dynamic storage access accumulator." "The constant CPU buffer redirects accesses from storage to achieve higher feature aggregation effective bandwidth."

ข้อมูลเชิงลึกที่สำคัญจาก

by Jeongmin Bri... ที่ arxiv.org 03-08-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.16384.pdf
Accelerating Sampling and Aggregation Operations in GNN Frameworks with  GPU Initiated Direct Storage Accesses

สอบถามเพิ่มเติม

How does the use of memory-mapped files compare to GPU-initiated direct storage access in terms of performance and efficiency

Memory-mapped files and GPU-initiated direct storage access serve as two distinct approaches for handling data access in large-scale graph processing. Memory-mapped files involve mapping the entire dataset into virtual memory, allowing for on-demand retrieval of data from storage to CPU memory when needed. This method can lead to high software overhead due to page faults and may not fully utilize available hardware resources efficiently. On the other hand, GPU-initiated direct storage access, as implemented in the GIDS dataloader, enables GPU threads to directly fetch feature vectors from storage devices without involving the CPU. By leveraging massive parallelism offered by GPUs and minimizing software overhead related to data transfers, this approach can significantly enhance performance and efficiency in accessing large datasets for graph processing tasks. In terms of performance and efficiency, GPU-initiated direct storage access typically outperforms memory-mapped files due to its ability to maximize hardware utilization and reduce latency associated with traditional CPU-based methods. The dynamic nature of GPU-oriented techniques allows for more effective resource management and faster data retrieval processes compared to relying solely on CPU-centric approaches like memory mapping.

What are potential drawbacks or limitations of relying heavily on GPU-oriented techniques for large-scale graph processing

While GPU-oriented techniques like those employed in the GIDS dataloader offer significant advantages in accelerating sampling and aggregation operations for large-scale graphs, there are potential drawbacks or limitations that should be considered: Hardware Dependency: Heavy reliance on GPUs for graph processing may pose challenges if there are limitations or bottlenecks within the GPU architecture itself. Issues such as limited VRAM capacity or slower PCIe bandwidth could impact overall performance. Complexity: Implementing GPU-specific optimizations requires a deep understanding of both hardware capabilities and software integration. This complexity can make development more challenging compared to traditional CPU-based solutions. Scalability: While GPUs excel at parallel processing tasks, scaling up systems with multiple GPUs or nodes introduces complexities related to synchronization, communication overheads, and load balancing across different hardware components. Cost: Utilizing high-end GPUs for large-scale graph processing can be costly both in terms of initial investment and ongoing operational expenses related to power consumption and maintenance. Programming Challenges: Developing efficient algorithms that fully leverage GPU capabilities while maintaining code readability and scalability can be a non-trivial task requiring specialized expertise.

How might advancements in hardware technology impact the effectiveness of solutions like the GIDS dataloader in optimizing resource utilization

Advancements in hardware technology play a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of solutions like the GIDS dataloader in optimizing resource utilization for large-scale graph processing: GPU Improvements: Enhanced GPUs with higher compute capability, increased VRAM capacity, improved interconnect technologies (e.g., NVLink), or specialized accelerators (e.g., tensor cores) can further boost performance gains achieved through GPU-oriented techniques like GIDS. 2Storage Innovations: Faster SSDs with lower latency rates or emerging technologies such as persistent memory (e.g., Intel Optane) could provide even quicker data access speeds when combined with optimized strategies like direct storage accesses initiated by GPUs. 3Interconnect Enhancements: Advancements in PCIe standards or alternative interconnect technologies might alleviate potential bottlenecks between CPUs/GPUs/storage devices. 4Hybrid Architectures: Future developments focusing on hybrid architectures combining CPUs,GPU's,FPGAs etc.,might offer new opportunities for optimizing resource utilization based on specific workload requirements. 5Software Optimization: Continued improvementsinsoftware optimization tools,suchas compilersand libraries tailoredforGNNworkloads,couldfurtherenhancetheefficiencyofGPU-acceleratedgraphprocessingtechniqueslikeGIDSDataloader Overall,theevolutionofhardwaretechnologywillcontinuetoplayakeyroleinshapingthelandscapeoflarge-scalegaphprocessing,anditwillbeessentialtoadaptGNNframeworksanddataloaderstoleverageemerginginnovationsforoptimalperformanceandresourceutilization
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star