Organ-Sparing Treatment for T1 and T2 Penile Cancer Review

แนวคิดหลัก

Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) is a viable alternative to traditional penectomy for T1-T2 penile cancer, preserving quality of life and function.

บทคัดย่อ

Standalone Note here

Abstract

• Penile cancer is rare in high-income countries.
• Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) offers comparable oncologic outcomes with improved quality of life.
• Importance of early detection for patient survival.

Recent Findings

• Patient survival depends on early detection of lymph node metastasis.
• Referral to high-volume centers for optimal treatment is crucial.

Summary

• OSS is recommended for small and localized PeCa (T1-T2).
• Different techniques available with varying response rates.
• Partial or radical penectomy feasible in case of tumor recurrence without impacting overall survival.

Introduction

• PeCa prevalence varies based on socioeconomic conditions.
• Delayed diagnosis due to lack of awareness and stigma.
• Conservative approaches improve patient satisfaction.
• OSS role in PeCa management still under evaluation.
• Guidelines cautious about OSS use in T1-T2 PeCa due to lack of trials.

สถิติ

Patient survival largely depends on spotting and treating lymph node metastasis at an early stage.
The mortality rate ranges from 0.15 to 0.37 per 10,000 men.
About 40% of PeCas are diagnosed in a localized stage, with a 5-year survival rate nearly 90%.

คำพูด

"Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) has the potential to remove the primary tumor with comparable oncologic outcomes while maintaining penile length, sexual and urinary function."
"Treatment-related changes in the perception of masculinity along with aesthetics, sensitivity, and dimension of genitalia are correlated with impairment of sexual function and interpersonal relationships deterioration."

ข้อมูลเชิงลึกที่สำคัญจาก

Organ-Sparing Treatment for T1 and T2 Penile Cancer

by Carlo Maria ... ที่ www.medscape.com 09-04-2023

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/995611

สอบถามเพิ่มเติม

What are the challenges in implementing organ-sparing surgery for penile cancer in low-income countries

Implementing organ-sparing surgery for penile cancer in low-income countries faces several challenges. One major challenge is the lack of access to specialized healthcare facilities with the expertise to perform these complex procedures. In low-income settings, there may be limited resources, including trained healthcare professionals, advanced surgical equipment, and post-operative care facilities, which are essential for successful organ-sparing surgeries. Additionally, cultural beliefs and stigmas surrounding genital cancers in some low-income countries may lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment initiation, further complicating the implementation of organ-sparing surgery.

Is there a risk of undertreatment with organ-sparing surgery compared to traditional penectomy

There is a risk of undertreatment with organ-sparing surgery compared to traditional penectomy in penile cancer patients. While organ-sparing surgery aims to preserve the patient's quality of life by maintaining sexual and urinary function, there is a concern about the potential for incomplete tumor removal and higher rates of local recurrence associated with organ-sparing procedures. This risk of undertreatment must be carefully weighed against the benefits of preserving organ function and aesthetics. Close monitoring and follow-up are essential to detect any signs of recurrence early and ensure timely intervention if needed.

How can societal perceptions of masculinity impact treatment decisions for penile cancer patients

Societal perceptions of masculinity can significantly impact treatment decisions for penile cancer patients. The traditional association of masculinity with physical attributes, including genitalia, may influence a patient's willingness to undergo organ-sparing surgery over traditional penectomy. Patients may fear emasculation or loss of sexual function, leading them to opt for more radical surgical approaches despite the potential impact on their quality of life. Healthcare providers must address these societal perceptions sensitively and provide comprehensive counseling to help patients make informed decisions based on their individual values and preferences. Additionally, involving mental health professionals in the decision-making process can help address any psychological concerns related to body image and masculinity.