toplogo
Giriş Yap

Decentralized Moderation for Interoperable Social Networks: Leveraging Conversational Context to Detect Toxic Content


Temel Kavramlar
Leveraging conversational context using a graph-based deep learning model (GraphNLI) to effectively detect toxic content in decentralized, interoperable social networks like Pleroma.
Özet
The paper addresses the challenges of content moderation in decentralized, interoperable social networks like Pleroma, where conversations are fragmented across multiple instances due to partial federation. Key highlights: Reconstructed 2 million conversations in 713 Pleroma instances, finding that conversations are often fragmented across instances. Showed that toxic content is more likely to spread and receive higher engagement (reblogs, replies) compared to non-toxic content. Proposed a GraphNLI-based approach that leverages conversational context to effectively detect toxicity, outperforming a BERT-based baseline. Found that large and medium-sized instances can effectively detect toxicity using only local data, but small instances struggle due to limited training data. Evaluated federation strategies to help small instances, with model sharing achieving the best performance (0.8826 macro-F1) by allowing small instances to fine-tune on models from larger instances. The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the moderation challenges in decentralized, interoperable social networks and proposes effective solutions to address them.
İstatistikler
The average number of reblogs for toxic toots is 0.556, while for non-toxic toots it is 0.271. The average number of direct replies to toxic toots is 1.482, while for non-toxic toots it is 1.354. The percentage of conversations with at least one toxic toot increases from 10% for conversations with 2 toots to 50% for conversations with 10 or more toots.
Alıntılar
"Decentralisation and interoperability, however, pose new challenges. Decentralisation limits the human and data resources required for (semi) automating moderation. Interoperability limits the visibility and ability to affect content generated in a remote instance." "We find that up to 14 instances participate in the same conversation and that the level of fragmentation increases with the number of instances."

Önemli Bilgiler Şuradan Elde Edildi

by Vibhor Agarw... : arxiv.org 04-05-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.03048.pdf
Decentralised Moderation for Interoperable Social Networks

Daha Derin Sorular

How can the proposed federation strategies be extended to handle cases where instances have different moderation policies or trust levels?

The proposed federation strategies can be extended to handle instances with different moderation policies or trust levels by implementing a more sophisticated information-sharing mechanism. One approach could involve establishing a trust framework among instances based on reputation scores or past behavior. Instances with higher trust levels could have more access to shared data or models, while instances with lower trust levels could have restricted access. This way, the federation strategies can adapt based on the trustworthiness of the instances involved. Additionally, a dynamic policy adaptation mechanism could be implemented where instances negotiate and agree on moderation policies before sharing data or models. This would ensure that each instance's unique policies and requirements are respected while still benefiting from the shared information.

What are the potential privacy implications of the model sharing approach, and how can they be mitigated?

The model sharing approach, while effective for improving moderation in decentralized platforms, raises privacy concerns as it involves sharing trained models between instances. One potential privacy implication is the risk of exposing sensitive information contained in the model parameters, especially if the models are not properly anonymized or encrypted before sharing. To mitigate these privacy risks, several measures can be taken: Anonymization: Before sharing the model, all sensitive information should be anonymized to remove any identifying details. Encryption: Implement strong encryption techniques to protect the model parameters during transit and storage. Access Control: Implement strict access control mechanisms to ensure that only authorized instances can access the shared models. Data Minimization: Share only the necessary model parameters required for fine-tuning, rather than the entire model, to minimize the exposure of sensitive information. Audit Trails: Maintain detailed audit trails to track who accessed the shared models and for what purpose, enhancing accountability and transparency.

How can the insights from this study on decentralized moderation be applied to other decentralized platforms beyond the fediverse, such as decentralized file storage or decentralized finance?

The insights from this study on decentralized moderation can be applied to other decentralized platforms beyond the fediverse by adapting the proposed strategies to suit the specific requirements of each platform. Here are some ways these insights can be applied: Decentralized File Storage: In decentralized file storage platforms like IPFS, similar federation strategies can be used to enhance content moderation. By sharing toxicity detection models or relevant data between nodes, the platform can collectively improve content filtering and ensure a safer environment for users. Decentralized Finance (DeFi): In the realm of decentralized finance, where trust and security are paramount, the concept of federated moderation can be applied to detect fraudulent activities or malicious actors. By sharing detection models or data on suspicious transactions, DeFi platforms can collectively combat financial fraud and enhance security. Cross-Platform Collaboration: Insights from this study can also be used to facilitate cross-platform collaboration in the decentralized ecosystem. Platforms can establish protocols for sharing moderation tools or strategies to create a safer and more cohesive decentralized environment across various services.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star