toplogo
登入

Enhancing Transparency in Automated Speech Recognition: ConFides, a Visual Analytics Solution for Transcription Analysis and Exploration


核心概念
ConFides, a visual analytics system, aims to enhance understanding of speech-to-text results by visually representing the confidence associated with the transcription, enabling exploration and post-AI-transcription editing.
摘要

The paper introduces ConFides, a visual analytics system developed in collaboration with intelligence analysts to address the issue of inadequate communication of confidence scores in automatic speech recognition (ASR) outputs. ConFides aims to aid exploration and post-AI-transcription editing by visually representing the confidence associated with the transcription.

The system consists of three main interactive views:

  1. Confidence Overview: Provides a visual overview of the transcription data, where each rectangle element corresponds to a segment in the transcript, with the width representing the audio length and the opacity representing the average confidence of the segment.
  2. Transcription Editor: Displays the automatic transcription with visual and textual representations of the confidence for each word, allowing the analyst to edit the transcription.
  3. Context Word Tree: Depicts a node-link diagram where nodes are words and links indicate word co-occurrence within the same segment, providing context to a specific search term.

The paper demonstrates the applicability of ConFides through a case study involving the analysis of the Nixon White House tapes, where analysts can use the system to find relevant data and answer key intelligence questions more efficiently.

The authors discuss the importance of AI transparency in fostering and calibrating appropriate trust in visual analytics, especially in scenarios involving domain experts making high-risk decisions. They also explore opportunities for improving textual data cleaning, promoting transparency, and fostering trust to enhance the efficacy of human-machine collaborations within visual analytics.

edit_icon

客製化摘要

edit_icon

使用 AI 重寫

edit_icon

產生引用格式

translate_icon

翻譯原文

visual_icon

產生心智圖

visit_icon

前往原文

統計資料
"a larger [confidence] value indicates a higher probability that the identified item correctly matches the item spoken" The confidence score for the term "pandas" is 52%, while the overall average confidence of the line segment is 80%. The confidence level for the cities listed (San Diego, St. Louis, New York, and Chicago) ranges from 93% to 100%.
引述
"Confidence scores of automatic speech recognition (ASR) outputs are often inadequately communicated, preventing its seamless integration into analytical workflows." "Relying on AI, especially in human-machine collaborations, without awareness of these uncertainties can be detrimental, as the quality of an analyst's work is a direct result of the trust [8] in and accuracy of the information presented to them."

深入探究

How can the system be extended to provide more advanced data cleaning and error correction capabilities, leveraging the analyst's domain knowledge and the system's understanding of confidence levels?

To enhance data cleaning and error correction capabilities in ConFides, the system can incorporate interactive features that allow analysts to provide feedback on the accuracy of transcriptions based on their domain expertise. Analysts could have the ability to flag specific segments or words that they believe are inaccurately transcribed, along with explanations or corrections. This feedback loop can be used to improve the transcription model over time. Additionally, the system could suggest alternative words or phrases based on the context and the confidence levels associated with the transcribed text. By leveraging the analyst's domain knowledge and the system's understanding of confidence levels, ConFides can offer tailored suggestions for data cleaning and error correction, ultimately improving the overall quality of transcriptions.

What other types of uncertainty, beyond confidence scores, could be communicated to the analyst to further enhance trust and appropriate reliance on the AI-assisted transcription?

In addition to confidence scores, ConFides could communicate uncertainty through metadata such as speaker identification accuracy, background noise levels, and speech clarity indicators. By providing information on the reliability of speaker labels and the presence of background noise that may affect transcription accuracy, analysts can better assess the overall quality of the transcribed data. Furthermore, incorporating timestamps for each segment can help analysts identify areas where the speech may be unclear or overlapping, leading to potential transcription errors. By offering a comprehensive view of various sources of uncertainty, analysts can make more informed decisions about the reliability of the AI-assisted transcription and adjust their reliance accordingly.

How can the design of ConFides be adapted to support collaborative analysis workflows, where multiple analysts work together to explore and make sense of the transcribed audio data?

To support collaborative analysis workflows, ConFides can introduce features for real-time collaboration and annotation. Analysts should be able to leave comments, annotations, and suggestions directly within the transcription interface, facilitating communication and knowledge sharing among team members. Additionally, a version control system can track changes made by different analysts, allowing for easy comparison and reverting to previous versions if needed. Integration with communication tools like chat or video conferencing can enable analysts to discuss findings and insights while exploring the transcribed audio data together. Moreover, the system can provide shared visualization spaces where multiple analysts can view and interact with the same data simultaneously, fostering collaboration and collective sense-making. By adapting the design of ConFides to support collaborative analysis workflows, the system can enhance teamwork, decision-making, and overall productivity in intelligence analysis tasks.
0
star