Efficient Difference of Submodular Minimization via DC Programming Algorithms
Основні поняття
Difference of submodular (DS) minimization can be equivalently formulated as the minimization of the difference of two convex (DC) functions. The authors introduce variants of the DC algorithm (DCA) and its complete form (CDCA) to efficiently solve the DC program corresponding to DS minimization, and establish new connections between the two problems to obtain stronger theoretical guarantees.
Анотація
The paper studies the problem of minimizing the difference of two submodular (DS) functions, which naturally arises in various machine learning applications. While minimizing submodular functions can be done efficiently, minimizing DS functions is a challenging non-convex optimization problem.
The key contributions are:
-
The authors show that a special instance of DCA and CDCA, where iterates are integral, monotonically decreases the DS function value at every iteration, and converges with rate O(1/k) to a local minimum and strong local minimum of the DS problem, respectively. DCA reduces to the existing SubSup algorithm in this case.
-
The authors introduce variants of DCA and CDCA, called DCAR and CDCAR, where iterates are rounded at each iteration, which allows them to add regularization. They extend the convergence properties of DCA and CDCA to these variants.
-
For CDCA, the authors show how to efficiently obtain an approximate stationary point of the concave minimization subproblem using the Frank-Wolfe algorithm.
-
The authors study the effect of adding regularization both theoretically and empirically.
-
The proposed methods are shown to outperform existing baselines on two applications: speech corpus selection and feature selection.
Translate Source
To Another Language
Generate MindMap
from source content
Difference of Submodular Minimization via DC Programming
Статистика
The DS minimization problem can be equivalently formulated as the minimization of the difference of two convex (DC) functions.
Minimizing DS functions up to any constant factor multiplicative approximation requires exponential time, and obtaining any positive polynomial time computable multiplicative approximation is NP-Hard.
Even finding a local minimum of DS functions is PLS complete.
Цитати
"Minimizing the difference of two submodular (DS) functions is a problem that naturally occurs in various machine learning problems."
"Unlike submodular functions which can be minimized in polynomial time, minimizing DS functions up to any constant factor multiplicative approximation requires exponential time, and obtaining any positive polynomial time computable multiplicative approximation is NP-Hard."
Глибші Запити
What other machine learning applications beyond the ones discussed could benefit from the proposed DS minimization algorithms
The proposed DS minimization algorithms could benefit various machine learning applications beyond the ones discussed in the context. One such application could be in the field of image segmentation, where the goal is to partition an image into meaningful regions. DS minimization algorithms could help in selecting the most relevant features or regions in the image to improve the segmentation accuracy. Additionally, in natural language processing tasks such as text summarization, the algorithms could aid in selecting the most informative sentences or words to generate concise and coherent summaries. Furthermore, in recommendation systems, DS minimization could assist in selecting the most relevant items or products to recommend to users based on their preferences and behavior.
How could the proposed methods be extended to handle additional constraints or objectives beyond the basic DS minimization problem
To handle additional constraints or objectives beyond the basic DS minimization problem, the proposed methods could be extended in several ways. One approach could be to incorporate regularization terms in the objective function to enforce specific constraints or promote certain properties in the solution. For example, adding a penalty term for selecting too many features in feature selection tasks could help in feature sparsity. Another extension could involve incorporating domain-specific constraints or side information into the optimization framework to guide the selection process. Additionally, the algorithms could be adapted to handle multi-objective optimization by considering trade-offs between different objectives and constraints, leading to more robust and flexible solutions.
Are there any special cases or structural properties of DS functions that could be further exploited to improve the efficiency and performance of the proposed algorithms
There are several special cases and structural properties of DS functions that could be further exploited to enhance the efficiency and performance of the proposed algorithms. One such property is the modular structure of certain DS functions, which could be leveraged to develop specialized algorithms tailored to this specific case. Additionally, the submodularity property of DS functions, which captures the diminishing returns property, could be utilized to design more efficient optimization strategies that exploit this property to guide the selection process. Moreover, the sparsity and combinatorial nature of DS functions could be exploited to develop algorithms that efficiently handle large-scale problems with a vast number of potential selections, leading to faster and more scalable solutions.
