ідея - Prompt engineering - # Automatic prompt selection for large language models

Automatic Prompt Selection: Optimizing Prompts for Large Language Models to Enhance Zero-Shot Question Answering Performance

Q: How can the prompt database generation process be further improved to ensure higher quality and diversity of the candidate prompts

To enhance the prompt database generation process for higher quality and diversity of candidate prompts, several improvements can be implemented: Semantic Diversity: Incorporate techniques like semantic similarity measures to ensure that prompts are distinct and cover a wide range of variations in expressing the same concept. This can prevent redundancy and enhance the diversity of prompts. Prompt Relevance: Introduce a relevance scoring mechanism during prompt generation to prioritize prompts that are more likely to lead to correct answers. This can be based on historical performance data or initial testing. Contextual Understanding: Utilize contextual embeddings or pre-trained language models to generate prompts that are contextually relevant to the input data. This can improve the alignment between prompts and the specific question-context pairs. Human-in-the-Loop Validation: Implement a validation step where human annotators review and provide feedback on the generated prompts. This can ensure that the prompts are linguistically accurate, relevant, and diverse. Dynamic Prompt Generation: Explore dynamic prompt generation techniques that adapt prompts based on the complexity of the input data or the performance of the model. This can lead to more tailored prompts for different scenarios.

Q: What are the potential drawbacks or limitations of the preference learning approach used to train the prompt evaluator, and how could it be enhanced

The preference learning approach used to train the prompt evaluator has certain limitations that can be addressed for enhancement: Bias and Fairness: Guard against biases in the training data that may influence the prompt evaluator's decision-making process. Implement fairness checks to ensure that prompts are evaluated objectively and without bias. Generalization: Enhance the prompt evaluator's ability to generalize to unseen data by incorporating techniques like transfer learning or domain adaptation. This can improve the evaluator's performance on diverse datasets. Robustness: Introduce robustness checks to ensure that the prompt evaluator can handle noisy or imperfect data during training. Techniques like data augmentation or regularization can help improve the evaluator's resilience. Interpretability: Enhance the interpretability of the prompt evaluator by providing insights into why certain prompts are scored higher than others. This can help in understanding the decision-making process and improving the overall transparency of the model.

Q: Given the success of the APS method on arithmetic word problems, how could it be extended to handle more complex reasoning tasks that require multi-step inference or external knowledge retrieval

To extend the APS method to handle more complex reasoning tasks requiring multi-step inference or external knowledge retrieval, the following strategies can be employed: Hierarchical Prompting: Develop a hierarchical prompting approach where prompts are generated in a sequential manner to guide the model through multiple reasoning steps. This can help break down complex tasks into manageable sub-tasks. External Knowledge Integration: Incorporate external knowledge sources or knowledge graphs to provide additional context and information for the prompts. This can enable the model to access relevant information beyond the input data. Multi-Modal Prompting: Introduce multi-modal prompts that combine text with other modalities like images, graphs, or tables to provide a richer input for the model. This can enhance the model's understanding and reasoning capabilities. Adaptive Prompting: Implement adaptive prompting techniques that adjust the prompts based on the model's intermediate outputs or feedback. This dynamic approach can help the model navigate complex tasks more effectively. Domain-Specific Prompting: Tailor the prompts to specific domains or tasks by incorporating domain-specific knowledge and language patterns. This can improve the model's performance on specialized tasks that require domain expertise.

Основні поняття

An effective approach to automatically select the optimal prompt for a given input from a finite set of synthetic candidate prompts, balancing prompt generality-specificity and eliminating the need for resource-intensive training and inference.

Анотація

The paper proposes an approach called Automatic Prompt Selection (APS) to automatically select the optimal prompt for a given input from a finite set of synthetic candidate prompts. The approach consists of three steps:

Prompt Database Generation:
- The training data is clustered into coherent groups.
- For each cluster, an LLM-based prompt generator is used to create a set of diverse prompts.
- The prompts from all clusters are combined into a versatile prompt database.
Prompt Evaluator Training:
- A dataset of input-prompt-output tuples is synthesized by querying a data generation LLM with the generated prompts and training inputs.
- A prompt evaluator is trained on this dataset using a preference loss, encouraging high scores for good prompts and low scores for bad ones.
Prompt Ranking:
- During inference, given a testing input, the highest-scoring prompt from the database is selected using the prompt evaluator.
- The selected prompt is then used with a downstream LLM to compute the final output.

The proposed method balances prompt generality-specificity and eliminates the need for resource-intensive training and inference, demonstrating competitive performance on zero-shot question-answering datasets: GSM8K, MultiArith, and AQuA.

Налаштувати зведення

Переписати за допомогою ШІ

Згенерувати цитати

Перекласти джерело

Іншою мовою

Згенерувати інтелект-карту

із вихідного контенту

Перейти до джерела

arxiv.org

Статистика

The dataset GSM8K consists of 7,473 training and 1,319 test problems that require between 2 and 8 steps to solve, involving basic arithmetic operations.
The dataset MultiArith has 420 training and 180 test problems that demand the application of multiple arithmetic operations and logical reasoning.
The dataset AQuA contains more than 100,000 algebraic word problems, with each sample having a question, options, rationale, and the correct option.

Цитати

"Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a cornerstone in natural language processing (NLP), propelled by advancements in scaling techniques and attention mechanisms."
"Effective prompting reduces the necessity for resource-intensive fine-tuning on task-specific data, offering a cost-effective and time-saving alternative."
"One limitation of current approaches is that they struggle to strike a balance between prompt generality and specificity, either relying on a single prompt for all inputs (lacking flexibility) or generating a distinctive prompt per input (expanding the search space and potentially destabilizing the system)."

Ключові висновки, отримані з

Automatic Prompt Selection for Large Language Models

by Viet-Tung Do... о arxiv.org 04-04-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.02717.pdf

Automatic Prompt Selection for Large Language Models

Глибші Запити

How can the prompt database generation process be further improved to ensure higher quality and diversity of the candidate prompts

To enhance the prompt database generation process for higher quality and diversity of candidate prompts, several improvements can be implemented:

Semantic Diversity: Incorporate techniques like semantic similarity measures to ensure that prompts are distinct and cover a wide range of variations in expressing the same concept. This can prevent redundancy and enhance the diversity of prompts.
Prompt Relevance: Introduce a relevance scoring mechanism during prompt generation to prioritize prompts that are more likely to lead to correct answers. This can be based on historical performance data or initial testing.
Contextual Understanding: Utilize contextual embeddings or pre-trained language models to generate prompts that are contextually relevant to the input data. This can improve the alignment between prompts and the specific question-context pairs.
Human-in-the-Loop Validation: Implement a validation step where human annotators review and provide feedback on the generated prompts. This can ensure that the prompts are linguistically accurate, relevant, and diverse.
Dynamic Prompt Generation: Explore dynamic prompt generation techniques that adapt prompts based on the complexity of the input data or the performance of the model. This can lead to more tailored prompts for different scenarios.

What are the potential drawbacks or limitations of the preference learning approach used to train the prompt evaluator, and how could it be enhanced

The preference learning approach used to train the prompt evaluator has certain limitations that can be addressed for enhancement:

Bias and Fairness: Guard against biases in the training data that may influence the prompt evaluator's decision-making process. Implement fairness checks to ensure that prompts are evaluated objectively and without bias.
Generalization: Enhance the prompt evaluator's ability to generalize to unseen data by incorporating techniques like transfer learning or domain adaptation. This can improve the evaluator's performance on diverse datasets.
Robustness: Introduce robustness checks to ensure that the prompt evaluator can handle noisy or imperfect data during training. Techniques like data augmentation or regularization can help improve the evaluator's resilience.
Interpretability: Enhance the interpretability of the prompt evaluator by providing insights into why certain prompts are scored higher than others. This can help in understanding the decision-making process and improving the overall transparency of the model.

Given the success of the APS method on arithmetic word problems, how could it be extended to handle more complex reasoning tasks that require multi-step inference or external knowledge retrieval

To extend the APS method to handle more complex reasoning tasks requiring multi-step inference or external knowledge retrieval, the following strategies can be employed:

Hierarchical Prompting: Develop a hierarchical prompting approach where prompts are generated in a sequential manner to guide the model through multiple reasoning steps. This can help break down complex tasks into manageable sub-tasks.
External Knowledge Integration: Incorporate external knowledge sources or knowledge graphs to provide additional context and information for the prompts. This can enable the model to access relevant information beyond the input data.
Multi-Modal Prompting: Introduce multi-modal prompts that combine text with other modalities like images, graphs, or tables to provide a richer input for the model. This can enhance the model's understanding and reasoning capabilities.
Adaptive Prompting: Implement adaptive prompting techniques that adjust the prompts based on the model's intermediate outputs or feedback. This dynamic approach can help the model navigate complex tasks more effectively.
Domain-Specific Prompting: Tailor the prompts to specific domains or tasks by incorporating domain-specific knowledge and language patterns. This can improve the model's performance on specialized tasks that require domain expertise.