Khái niệm cốt lõi
This work presents a control barrier function-induced neural controller (CBF-INC) that can be integrated into sampling-based motion planning algorithms to efficiently explore the configuration space while ensuring safety.
Tóm tắt
The authors propose a framework called CBF-INC-RRT that combines the strengths of control barrier functions (CBFs) for real-time collision avoidance and sampling-based motion planning algorithms like RRT for long-horizon planning.
The key components are:
- CBF-INC: A neural network-based controller that is trained to satisfy CBF constraints, handling both state-based (signed distance) and LiDAR-based (point cloud) observations. This allows the controller to balance safety and goal-reaching without being overly conservative.
- Integration of CBF-INC into the steer function of RRT: This increases the likelihood of successfully expanding a node, reducing the overall exploration cost.
The authors evaluate the proposed framework on 4-DoF and 7-DoF manipulators in simulation and on a real Franka Panda robot. Compared to vanilla RRT and other baselines, CBF-INC-RRT achieves significantly higher success rates (up to 14% improvement) and reduces the number of explored nodes (up to 30% reduction) on challenging test cases.
Thống kê
The authors report the following key metrics:
Success rate (SR) on easy and hard test cases
Number of explored nodes on easy and hard test cases
Total planning time on easy and hard test cases
Trích dẫn
"Compared to manually crafted CBF which suffers from over-approximating robot geometry, CBF-INC can balance safety and goal-reaching better without being over-conservative."
"Given state-based input, our neural CBF-induced neural controller-enhanced RRT (CBF-INC-RRT) can increase the success rate by 14% while reducing the number of nodes explored by 30%, compared with vanilla RRT on hard test cases."
"With point cloud input setting, where many methods (like vanilla RRT and hand-crafted CBF) are not directly applicable, CBF-INC-RRT still improve the success rate by 10% on challenging cases, compared with planning with other steering controllers."