A Comprehensive Survey on Process-Oriented Automatic Text Summarization with Exploration of LLM-Based Methods

Khái niệm cốt lõi

This survey explores process-oriented automatic text summarization and the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on ATS methods.

Tóm tắt

This comprehensive survey delves into the evolution of Automatic Text Summarization (ATS) methods, emphasizing practical implementations and the influence of Large Language Models (LLMs). The study covers various approaches, from statistical models to deep learning techniques, providing insights into the challenges and advancements in the field.

Thống kê

"The dataset contains nearly 10 million English news documents and summaries are made up of news headlines."
"The XSum dataset contains 226,711 Wayback archived BBC articles ranging over almost a decade (2010 to 2017) and covering a wide variety of domains."
"Scisumm contains the 1,000 most cited academic papers in the ACL Anthology Network."
"ArXiv, PubMed datasets contain more than 300,000 academic papers in total."
"WikiHow dataset consists of more than 230,000 article-summary pairs obtained from WikiHow knowledge base."
"LCSTS consists of over 2 million real Chinese short blogs from various domains."

Trích dẫn

"Automatic Text Summarization aims to condense extensive texts into concise and accurate summaries using NLP algorithms."
"Large Language Models have significantly improved the accuracy and coherence of generated summaries."
"The emergence of deep learning models has steered the trajectory of ATS towards advanced modeling techniques."
"Pre-training based approaches have substantially elevated the performance of ATS tasks."
"Extractive summarization models demonstrate an enhanced capability to capture precise terminologies."

Thông tin chi tiết chính được chắt lọc từ

A Comprehensive Survey on Process-Oriented Automatic Text Summarization with Exploration of LLM-Based Methods

by Hanlei Jin,Y... lúc arxiv.org 03-06-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.02901.pdf

Yêu cầu sâu hơn

How can extractive summarization models be improved to address redundancy and contextual contradictions?

Extractive summarization models can be enhanced to mitigate redundancy and contextual contradictions by incorporating more advanced techniques and strategies. Some ways to improve these models include:

Enhanced Sentence Ranking: Implementing more sophisticated algorithms for sentence ranking can help in selecting the most relevant sentences while avoiding redundant information. Techniques like graph-based methods, neural networks, or reinforcement learning can be employed to better assess sentence importance.

Contextual Understanding: Integrating natural language processing (NLP) techniques that focus on understanding context can aid in identifying redundancies and contradictions within the text. Utilizing pre-trained language models like BERT or GPT-3 can enhance the model's ability to grasp nuanced relationships between sentences.

Semantic Similarity Measures: By incorporating semantic similarity measures, extractive models can identify overlapping content and ensure that only unique information is included in the summary. This approach helps in reducing redundancy while maintaining coherence.

Fine-tuning Models: Regularly fine-tuning extractive summarization models with domain-specific data can improve their performance in capturing key information without duplications or inconsistencies.

Post-processing Steps: After extracting sentences for the summary, applying post-processing steps such as deduplication algorithms or coherence checks can further refine the output by eliminating redundant content and ensuring logical flow.

By implementing these strategies, extractive summarization models can effectively address issues related to redundancy and contextual contradictions, resulting in more concise and coherent summaries.

What are the potential drawbacks or limitations associated with abstractive summarization methods?

Abstractive summarization methods offer flexibility in generating summaries but come with certain drawbacks and limitations:

Content Fidelity: One of the primary challenges is maintaining content fidelity during abstraction. Abstractive methods may introduce new information not present in the source text, leading to inaccuracies or distortions of original meanings.

Complexity of Generation: Generating text from scratch requires a higher level of linguistic understanding compared to extraction-based approaches. Ensuring grammatical correctness, coherence, and fluency poses significant challenges for abstractive models.

Training Data Requirements: Abstractive summarization often necessitates larger amounts of training data compared to extractive methods due to the complexity of text generation tasks. Acquiring high-quality annotated datasets for training abstractive models can be resource-intensive.

4 .Evaluation Challenges: Assessing the quality of abstractive summaries is inherently subjective as it involves judging factors like informativeness, fluency, and relevance which are open to interpretation.
5 .Out-of-Domain Performance: Abstractive methods may struggle when applied outside their trained domains due to difficulties generalizing complex linguistic patterns across diverse topics.
6 .Computational Intensity: The computational resources required for training large-scale abstractive models like Transformers could be substantial making them less accessible for smaller organizations or projects.

How might advancements in Large Language Models impact future developments in Automatic Text Summarization?

Advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) are poised
to revolutionize Automatic Text Summarization (ATS) by offering several benefits:
1 .Improved Semantic Understanding: LLMs have demonstrated superior capabilities
in capturing intricate semantic relationships within texts,
enabling more accurate comprehension of context-sensitive
information essential for generating high-quality summaries.
2 .Enhanced Contextual Awareness: LLMs excel at retaining long-range dependencies
and contextual nuances across documents facilitating better
summary coherence through a deeper understanding of textual relations.
3 .Reduced Manual Intervention: With pre-trained LLMs like BERT,
GPT-3 available out-of-the-box; ATS systems leveraging these
models require minimal manual intervention thereby streamlining development processes
4 .Customizability & Adaptability:
LLMs provide a flexible framework allowing fine-tuning on specific ATS tasks enabling customization based on varied requirements
5 .Multimodal Integration:
The multimodal capabilities inherent within some LLMs enable integration with images audio video enriching ATS outputs with diverse media types
6 .Ethical Considerations:
As LLMs become increasingly prevalent ethical considerations around bias fairness transparency need addressing especially concerning sensitive topics summarized
Overall,Large Language Models hold immense promise towards advancing Automatic Text Summarisation by enhancing semantic accuracy improving context awareness reducing manual effort customising adaptability integrating multimodality whilst also raising ethical concerns requiring careful consideration