Sign In

The Truth About Jane Elliott’s Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes Experiment

Core Concepts
Challenging the validity of Jane Elliott's "one race" theory through her controversial experiment.
Jane Elliott's Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes experiment aimed to showcase the impact of discrimination based on eye color, highlighting the flaws in her "one race" theory. By dividing students into blue-eyed and brown-eyed groups and providing privileges based on eye color, Elliott perpetuated stereotypes and discrimination. The experiment revealed how such biases can lead to behavioral changes, with blue-eyed children becoming arrogant and bossy while brown-eyed children became timid and isolated. However, when roles were reversed, both groups recognized the injustice of being treated differently. This study sheds light on the complexities of prejudice and discrimination in society.
Jane Elliott conducted the Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes experiment for the first time in an all-white Ohio classroom on April 5, 1968. Companies like General Electric, Exxon, AT&T, and IBM hired Elliott for training sessions based on her work.
"As with any system of oppression, there needed to be a legitimizing myth to sustain it." "Their essays were published in the Riceville Recorder in an article…"

Deeper Inquiries

How does Jane Elliott's experiment challenge traditional views on racism?

Jane Elliott's experiment challenges traditional views on racism by directly confronting the idea of racial superiority and inferiority based on physical characteristics. By dividing students based on eye color and attributing intelligence and behavior traits to them, she highlights how arbitrary distinctions can lead to discrimination and prejudice. This challenges the notion that race is a valid basis for determining worth or ability, emphasizing the social construction of race rather than any inherent biological differences.

What are some potential criticisms of using eye color as a basis for discrimination?

Using eye color as a basis for discrimination in Jane Elliott's experiment raises several criticisms. Firstly, it simplifies complex issues of race and ethnicity into a binary distinction, overlooking the diversity within racial groups. Additionally, it reinforces essentialist beliefs about physical attributes correlating with character traits, perpetuating stereotypes. Critics may argue that focusing solely on eye color overlooks other forms of identity-based discrimination and fails to address systemic inequalities rooted in historical oppression.

How can this experiment be applied to understand broader societal issues beyond race?

Jane Elliott's experiment can be applied to understand broader societal issues beyond race by highlighting the impact of arbitrary divisions on group dynamics and individual behavior. By replicating similar experiments with different criteria such as socioeconomic status or gender, researchers can explore how privilege and disadvantage manifest across various identities. This approach helps illuminate power dynamics in society, shedding light on systemic inequalities that extend beyond racial categories. Ultimately, applying this experimental framework allows for a deeper understanding of social hierarchies and opportunities for challenging discriminatory practices across diverse contexts.