Autonomous Placement of Light Sources in Complex Environments to Match Desired Lighting Conditions
Core Concepts
The robot iteratively improves the placement of light sources by interleaving device placement and sensing actions, correcting errors in the model of the light propagation using a novel factor-graph based belief model.
Abstract
The paper presents a system for autonomously placing light sources in complex environments to match a user-specified desired lighting configuration. The key components of the system are:
-
Analytical Lighting Model: A ray-based light propagation model that computes the expected light intensity at each position based on the configured light sources and obstacles in the environment.
-
Probabilistic Lighting Model: A novel factor-graph based model that combines the analytical lighting model with sensor measurements to accurately model the uncertainty in the light propagation, improving the informative path planning routine.
-
Light Source Reconfiguration Trigger: A likelihood-based trigger that determines when the robot should reconfigure the light sources, balancing the need to update the configuration with the need to collect more measurements.
-
Light Source Configuration Algorithm: An optimization-based algorithm that computes the optimal placement and brightness of the light sources to match the desired lighting conditions.
The system is evaluated in simulation across environments with varying complexity, as well as in a real-world field trial. The results show that the proposed system outperforms a baseline approach, with a median error reduction of up to 9.8% in the most difficult simulated environment. The field trial demonstrates the system's ability to effectively place light sources in a real-world setting.
Translate Source
To Another Language
Generate MindMap
from source content
Active Signal Emitter Placement In Complex Environments
Stats
The paper reports a 9.8% median error reduction compared to a baseline system in the most difficult simulated environment.
Quotes
"We find that our system has a 9.8% median error reduction compared to a baseline system in simulations in the most difficult environment."
"We also run on-robot tests and determine that our system performs favorably compared to the baseline."
Deeper Inquiries
How could this system be extended to handle dynamic environments where the obstacles or desired lighting conditions change over time
To extend this system to handle dynamic environments where obstacles or desired lighting conditions change over time, several modifications and enhancements can be implemented. One approach could involve integrating real-time sensor data to update the probabilistic lighting model and factor graph representation continuously. By incorporating feedback from the robot's sensors as it navigates the environment, the system can adapt to changes in obstacles or lighting conditions. Additionally, the light source reconfiguration trigger could be adjusted to account for sudden changes in the environment, triggering reconfiguration based on significant deviations in the sensed light intensities compared to the predicted values. This adaptive approach would enable the system to respond dynamically to evolving environmental conditions and optimize the placement of light sources accordingly.
What other types of electromagnetic signal emitters, beyond light sources, could this approach be applied to, and what modifications would be required
This approach can be applied to various types of electromagnetic signal emitters beyond light sources, such as ultrawide-band beacons, Wi-Fi access points, radios, and more. To adapt the system for different types of emitters, the analytical lighting model would need to be tailored to the specific propagation properties of the signals emitted by each type of device. For example, for UWB anchors, the model would need to account for the unique signal characteristics of UWB signals and their interaction with the environment. Similarly, for Wi-Fi access points, the model would have to consider the signal propagation in indoor spaces and potential interference from obstacles. By customizing the analytical models and factor graph representations for different types of emitters, the system can effectively optimize the placement of a wide range of electromagnetic signal emitters for various applications.
Could the light source reconfiguration trigger be further improved by incorporating information about the robot's path planning and sensing actions, rather than just the current belief state
The light source reconfiguration trigger could be further improved by incorporating information about the robot's path planning and sensing actions in addition to the current belief state. By considering the robot's planned trajectory and the expected information gain from future sensing actions, the trigger can make more informed decisions about when to reconfigure the light sources. For instance, if the robot is moving towards an area with high uncertainty in light intensities, the trigger could prioritize reconfiguration to optimize the lighting placement in that region. By integrating path planning and sensing action information, the trigger can enhance the system's efficiency in adapting to changing environmental conditions and optimizing the placement of light sources based on the robot's exploration strategy.
