аналитика - Text Generation - # Fusion-in-Context (FiC) Task

Multi-Review Fusion-in-Context Study: Dataset, Evaluation, and Models

Q: How can the FiC task be extended to other multi-input contexts beyond business reviews?

The Fusion-in-Context (FiC) task, originally developed for the business reviews domain, can be extended to various other multi-input contexts by adapting the dataset creation process and evaluation framework. Here are some ways to extend FiC: Dataset Expansion: To apply FiC in different domains such as news articles or scientific papers, new datasets need to be curated with relevant source documents and corresponding summaries. The annotation process should consider the unique characteristics of each domain when marking highlights within the documents. Task Definition Modification: The task definition of FiC may need adjustments based on the specific requirements of different contexts. For example, in news articles, where facts are crucial, ensuring factual accuracy and coherence could be prioritized over opinion alignment. Evaluation Metrics Adaptation: Evaluation metrics used for assessing faithfulness and coverage may need to be tailored according to the nature of content in diverse domains. This ensures that models trained on these datasets are evaluated effectively. Model Training Variations: Models trained for FiC in one domain may require fine-tuning or retraining when applied to a new context due to differences in language use, writing styles, or types of information presented. Domain-Specific Challenges Consideration: Each domain presents its own challenges like handling technical jargon in scientific papers or bias detection in news articles. Adapting models and evaluation criteria accordingly is essential for successful application of FiC across various contexts.

Q: What are the potential risks associated with integrating FiC modules into generative systems?

Integrating Fusion-in-Context (FiC) modules into generative systems comes with certain risks that need careful consideration: Content Omission or Inclusion Errors: There is a risk that FiC modules might overlook certain highlighted content while generating text or inadvertently include non-highlighted information not intended for inclusion. Attribution Accuracy Concerns: When using pre-selected "highlights" as attributed sources within generated text, there is a possibility of inaccuracies if not all included content aligns correctly with these highlights leading to misattribution issues. Incomplete Attribution: If only parts of highlighted segments are integrated into generated text without proper attribution. Inaccurate referencing leading to incorrect citations within generated content. 4..Ethical Implications: - Misrepresentation: Incorrectly attributing opinions or statements from sources can lead to misrepresentation. - Plagiarism: Improperly citing sources could result in unintentional plagiarism which raises ethical concerns. 5..User Trust Issues: - Users relying on generative outputs expect accurate representation and faithful fusion based on selected highlights; any deviations erode trust levels. 6..Legal Ramifications - Copyright infringement: Failure to attribute sources correctly could lead to copyright violations if original creators' work is not acknowledged properly.

Q: How can reward functions be enhanced leverage RL-enrichment effectively nthe FIC task?

Incorporating Reinforcement Learning (RL) enrichment into Fusion-in-Context (FiC) tasks requires well-designed reward functions that guide model training effectively: 1..Define Clear Objectives Define clear objectives aligned with Faithfulness & Coverage metrics Ensure rewards incentivize generation faithful & comprehensive passages around highlighted segments 2..Dual-Reward Policy Implement dual-reward policy alternating between NLI-based faithfulness & trained coverage metrics Balance between both aspects during training enhances overall performance 3.Reward Function Refinement Refine reward function parameters considering trade-offs between faithfulness & coverage Optimize weights assigned based on importance given by human judgment evaluations 4.Adaptive Reward Mechanisms Develop adaptive mechanisms adjusting rewards dynamically during training Ensure model learns optimal balance between fidelity towards highlights & comprehensive coverage 5.Exploration vs Exploitation Balance Maintain equilibrium between exploration (trying out new strategies) & exploitation (leveraging learned policies) Encourage model exploration while exploiting known effective strategies through appropriate rewards By enhancing reward functions through thoughtful design considerations balancing multiple objectives efficiently leveraging RL-enrichment becomes more effective improving overall performance .

Основные понятия

Decomposing grounded text generation tasks into subtasks, focusing on content fusion in a multi-document setting.

Аннотация

This study introduces the Fusion-in-Context (FiC) task, emphasizing content fusion in a multi-document setting. It includes dataset creation, evaluation metrics development, and model experiments. The FiC task aims to generate coherent text from multiple documents based on pre-selected highlights.

Directory:

Abstract
- Grounded text generation requires content selection and consolidation.
- Modular approach proposed for generating coherent text.
Introduction
- End-to-end methods lack control over the generation process.
- Controlled Text Reduction (CTR) task focuses on fusion step.
Task Definition (FiC)
- Synthesizing coherent text from multiple documents with highlighted spans.
Dataset for FiC
- Dataset collection via controlled crowdsourcing in the business reviews domain.
Evaluation Framework
- Metrics for faithfulness and coverage assessment developed.
Experiments
- Baseline models tested on the FiC dataset.
Conclusion
- Future work includes expanding FiC to other contexts and leveraging traceability for attributed generation.

Настроить сводку

Переписать с помощью ИИ

Создать цитаты

Перевести источник

На другой язык

Создать интеллект-карту

из исходного контента

Перейти к источнику

arxiv.org

Статистика

"Our findings reveal that while these models show promising results, there is still room for further improvement in future research."
"In total we sampled 1000 instances of review-set/summary pairs."

Цитаты

Ключевые выводы из

Multi-Review Fusion-in-Context

by Aviv Slobodk... в arxiv.org 03-25-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.15351.pdf

Дополнительные вопросы

How can the FiC task be extended to other multi-input contexts beyond business reviews?

The Fusion-in-Context (FiC) task, originally developed for the business reviews domain, can be extended to various other multi-input contexts by adapting the dataset creation process and evaluation framework. Here are some ways to extend FiC:

Dataset Expansion: To apply FiC in different domains such as news articles or scientific papers, new datasets need to be curated with relevant source documents and corresponding summaries. The annotation process should consider the unique characteristics of each domain when marking highlights within the documents.

Task Definition Modification: The task definition of FiC may need adjustments based on the specific requirements of different contexts. For example, in news articles, where facts are crucial, ensuring factual accuracy and coherence could be prioritized over opinion alignment.

Evaluation Metrics Adaptation: Evaluation metrics used for assessing faithfulness and coverage may need to be tailored according to the nature of content in diverse domains. This ensures that models trained on these datasets are evaluated effectively.

Model Training Variations: Models trained for FiC in one domain may require fine-tuning or retraining when applied to a new context due to differences in language use, writing styles, or types of information presented.

Domain-Specific Challenges Consideration: Each domain presents its own challenges like handling technical jargon in scientific papers or bias detection in news articles. Adapting models and evaluation criteria accordingly is essential for successful application of FiC across various contexts.

What are the potential risks associated with integrating FiC modules into generative systems?

Integrating Fusion-in-Context (FiC) modules into generative systems comes with certain risks that need careful consideration:

Content Omission or Inclusion Errors: There is a risk that FiC modules might overlook certain highlighted content while generating text or inadvertently include non-highlighted information not intended for inclusion.

Attribution Accuracy Concerns: When using pre-selected "highlights" as attributed sources within generated text, there is a possibility of inaccuracies if not all included content aligns correctly with these highlights leading to misattribution issues.

Incomplete Attribution:

If only parts of highlighted segments are integrated into generated text without proper attribution.
Inaccurate referencing leading to incorrect citations within generated content.

4..Ethical Implications:
- Misrepresentation: Incorrectly attributing opinions or statements from sources can lead to misrepresentation.
- Plagiarism: Improperly citing sources could result in unintentional plagiarism which raises ethical concerns.
5..User Trust Issues:
- Users relying on generative outputs expect accurate representation and faithful fusion based on selected highlights; any deviations erode trust levels.
6..Legal Ramifications
- Copyright infringement: Failure to attribute sources correctly could lead to copyright violations if original creators' work is not acknowledged properly.

How can reward functions be enhanced leverage RL-enrichment effectively nthe FIC task?

Incorporating Reinforcement Learning (RL) enrichment into Fusion-in-Context (FiC) tasks requires well-designed reward functions that guide model training effectively:
1..Define Clear Objectives
Define clear objectives aligned with Faithfulness & Coverage metrics
Ensure rewards incentivize generation faithful & comprehensive passages around highlighted segments
2..Dual-Reward Policy
Implement dual-reward policy alternating between NLI-based faithfulness & trained coverage metrics
Balance between both aspects during training enhances overall performance
3.Reward Function Refinement
Refine reward function parameters considering trade-offs between faithfulness & coverage
Optimize weights assigned based on importance given by human judgment evaluations
4.Adaptive Reward Mechanisms
Develop adaptive mechanisms adjusting rewards dynamically during training
Ensure model learns optimal balance between fidelity towards highlights & comprehensive coverage
5.Exploration vs Exploitation Balance
Maintain equilibrium between exploration (trying out new strategies) & exploitation (leveraging learned policies)
Encourage model exploration while exploiting known effective strategies through appropriate rewards
By enhancing reward functions through thoughtful design considerations balancing multiple objectives efficiently leveraging RL-enrichment becomes more effective improving overall performance .